Cited by 32Biotin and Related StudiesAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsClick Chemistry and Applications

Highly effective proximate labeling in Drosophila

Open access
Zhang, Bo, Zhang, Yuanbing, Liu, Ji-Long·2021·G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The protein–protein interaction (PPI) is a basic strategy for life to operate. The analysis of PPIs in multicellular organisms is very important but extremely challenging because PPIs are particularly dynamic and variable among different development stages, tissues, cells, and even organelles. Therefore, understanding PPI needs a good resolution of time and space. More importantly, understanding in vivo PPI needs to be realized in situ. Proximity-based biotinylation combined with mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a powerful approach to study PPI networks and protein subcellular compartmentation. TurboID, the newly engineered promiscuous ligase, has been reported to label proximate proteins effectively in various species. In Drosophila, we systematically apply TurboID-mediated biotinylation in a wide range of developmental stages and tissues, and demonstrate the feasibility of TurboID-mediated labeling system in desired cell types. For a proof-of-principle, we use the TurboID-mediated biotinylation coupled with MS to distinguish CTP synthase with or without the ability to form filamentous cytoophidia, retrieving two distinct sets of proximate proteomes. Therefore, this makes it possible to map PPIs in vivo and in situ at a defined spatiotemporal resolution, and demonstrates a referable resource for cytoophidium proteome in Drosophila.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/g3journal/jkab077

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., & Liu, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Ji-Long
Venue
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
Published
2021-03-16
Volume
11
Issue
5
ISSN
2160-1836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136404485
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • ShanghaiTech University, National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771490)
  • UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12021/3, MC_U137788471)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Biotin and Related Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
TurboID, proximity labeling, protein-protein interaction, Drosophila, CTP synthase, cytoophidia, cytoskeletal filaments, in situ proteomics, spatiotemporal resolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Mass Spectrometry, Biotinylation, Proteome, Protein Interaction Maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review