Cited by 34Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiotin and Related Studies

Beyond hairballs: The use of quantitative mass spectrometry data to understand protein–protein interactions

Open access
Gingras, Anne-Claude, Raught, Brian·2012·FEBS Letters

Abstract

The past 10 years have witnessed a dramatic proliferation in the availability of protein interaction data. However, for interaction mapping based on affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP‐MS), there is a wealth of information present in the datasets that often goes unrecorded in public repositories, and as such remains largely unexplored. Further, how this type of data is represented and used by bioinformaticians has not been well established. Here, we point out some common mistakes in how AP‐MS data are handled, and describe how protein complex organization and interaction dynamics can be inferred using quantitative AP‐MS approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.03.065

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gingras, A.-C., & Raught, B.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Gingras, Anne-Claude
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
586
Issue
17
Pages
2723-2731
ISSN
  • 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-3468
OpenAlex
W2064661383
Cited by
34
References
117
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEBS Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • CIHR (MOP-84314, MOP-81268, MOP-119289)
  • NIH (R01RR024031)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Biotin and Related Studies
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, affinity purification mass spectrometry, quantitative mass spectrometry, protein complex organization, interaction dynamics, interaction mapping, data curation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Humans, Models, Biological, Peptides, Proteins, Software, Mass Spectrometry, Open Reading Frames, DNA, Complementary, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review