CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pogo-like Transposases Have Been Repeatedly Domesticated into CENP-B-Related Proteins

Mateo, Lidia, González, Josefa·2014·Genome Biology and Evolution
DOI 10.1093/gbe/evu153PMC PMC4231638
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gbe/evu153

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1.— Domain structure of pogo transposase and CR proteins. (A) Human CENP-B (hCENP-B), D. melanogaster pogo transposase (pogoR11), D. melanogaster CAG (CAG), yeast CENP-B homologs (Abp1, Cbh1, Cbh2), and Spodoptera frugiperda CENP-B homolog (SfCENP-B). CENP-B_N domain is shown in red, d1iufa1 in yellow, HTH_Tnp_Tc5 in green, DDE_1 in light blue, DIM in pink, and PCNA in dark blue. Domains predicted by hmmscan are shown as black-lined boxes, the other domains were inferred from experimental evidence. The discontinuous line indicates the deleted region. (B) 3D structure prediction of D. melanogaster CAG DBD using human CENP-B as a template. Z-score = −6.66 and −6.7 for CENP-B and CAG, respectively.
Fig. 1.— Domain structure of pogo transposase and CR proteins. (A) Human CENP-B (hCENP-B), D. melanogaster pogo transposase (pogoR11), D. melanogaster CAG (CAG), yeast CENP-B homologs (Abp1, Cbh1, Cbh2), and Spodoptera frugiperda CENP-B homolog (SfCENP-B). CENP-B_N domain is shown in red, d1iufa1 in yellow, HTH_Tnp_Tc5 in green, DDE_1 in light blue, DIM in pink, and PCNA in dark blue. Domains predicted by hmmscan are shown as black-lined boxes, the other domains were inferred from experimental evidence. The discontinuous line indicates the deleted region. (B) 3D structure prediction of D. melanogaster CAG DBD using human CENP-B as a template. Z-score = −6.66 and −6.7 for CENP-B and CAG, respectively.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2.— Biological processes overrepresented in the CAG 2-neighbourhood PPI. Hierarchical representation of the 72 biological process GO terms enriched in the neighbourhood-2 of CAG PPI network. Node colors indicate the level of significance. The overrepresented GO terms were categorized into four groups related to the neigbourhood-1 genes of CAG PPI: Cell cycle and spindle organization, response to stimulus and regulation of metabolic process, nucleic acids metabolism, and protein metabolism. GO terms enriched also in the neighborhood-2 of human CENP-B are represented inside gray boxes.
Fig. 2.— Biological processes overrepresented in the CAG 2-neighbourhood PPI. Hierarchical representation of the 72 biological process GO terms enriched in the neighbourhood-2 of CAG PPI network. Node colors indicate the level of significance. The overrepresented GO terms were categorized into four groups related to the neigbourhood-1 genes of CAG PPI: Cell cycle and spindle organization, response to stimulus and regulation of metabolic process, nucleic acids metabolism, and protein metabolism. GO terms enriched also in the neighborhood-2 of human CENP-B are represented inside gray boxes.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 3.— Phylogenetic distribution of pogo-related transposases and transposase-derived genes in metazoans. JR and CR indicate that the sequences belong to the JR clade and the CR clades, respectively. Filled-boxes depict pogo-related transposases and empty boxes depict transposase-derived genes. Numbers in the nodes show posterior probabilities (black) and bootstrap values (red). Shaded branches correspond to new CR proteins identified in this work and in d'Alençon et al 2011 (table 1) that have been incorporated to the previously published phylogeny (Casola et al 2008). Dotted lines represent branches not drawn to scale. Trees including nonmetazoans pogo-related transposases and transposase-derived genes are depicted in supplementary figures S2 and S3, Supplementary Material online.
Fig. 3.— Phylogenetic distribution of pogo-related transposases and transposase-derived genes in metazoans. JR and CR indicate that the sequences belong to the JR clade and the CR clades, respectively. Filled-boxes depict pogo-related transposases and empty boxes depict transposase-derived genes. Numbers in the nodes show posterior probabilities (black) and bootstrap values (red). Shaded branches correspond to new CR proteins identified in this work and in d'Alençon et al 2011 (table 1) that have been incorporated to the previously published phylogeny (Casola et al 2008). Dotted lines represent branches not drawn to scale. Trees including nonmetazoans pogo-related transposases and transposase-derived genes are depicted in supplementary figures S2 and S3, Supplementary Material online.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Aranda, 2011, PSICQUIC and PSISCORE: accessing and scoring molecular interactions, Nat Methods., 8, 528, 10.1038/nmeth.1637 · DOI
  2. Benchabane, 2011, Jerky/Earthbound facilitates cell-specific Wnt/Wingless signalling by modulating β-catenin-TCF activity, EMBO J., 30, 1444, 10.1038/emboj.2011.67 · DOI
  3. Bouazoune, 2005, dMi-2 chromatin binding and remodeling activities are regulated by dCK2 phosphorylation, J Biol Chem., 280, 41912, 10.1074/jbc.M507084200 · DOI
  4. Bowen, 2007, Exaptation of protein coding sequences from transposable elements, Genome Dyn., 3, 147, 10.1159/000107609 · DOI
  5. Cam, 2008, Host genome surveillance for retrotransposons by transposon-derived proteins, Nature, 451, 431, 10.1038/nature06499 · DOI
  6. Casola, 2008, Convergent domestication of pogo-like transposases into centromere-binding proteins in fission yeast and mammals, Mol Biol Evol., 25, 29, 10.1093/molbev/msm221 · DOI
  7. Chua, 2006, Exploiting indirect neighbours and topological weight to predict protein function from protein-protein interactions, Bioinformatics, 22, 1623, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl145 · DOI
  8. d’Alençon, 2011, Characterization of a CENP-B homolog in the holocentric Lepidoptera Spodoptera frugiperda, Gene, 485, 91, 10.1016/j.gene.2011.06.007 · DOI
  9. Darriba, 2011, ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution, Bioinformatics, 27, 1164, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr088 · DOI
  10. Deloger, 2009, Identification of expressed transposable element insertions in the sequenced genome of Drosophila melanogaster, Gene, 439, 55, 10.1016/j.gene.2009.03.015 · DOI
  11. Duan, 2010, SilkDB v2.0: a platform for silkworm (Bombyx mori) genome biology, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D453, 10.1093/nar/gkp801 · DOI
  12. Eswar, 2007, Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER, Curr Protoc Protein Sci., 2, 2.9.1, 10.1002/0471140864.ps0209s50 · DOI
  13. Fachinetti, 2013, A two-step mechanism for epigenetic specification of centromere identity and function, Nat Cell Biol., 15, 1056, 10.1038/ncb2805 · DOI
  14. Feschotte, 2007, DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes, Annu Rev Genet., 41, 331, 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090448 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Finn, 2011, HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, W29, 10.1093/nar/gkr367 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Giot, 2003, A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster, Science, 302, 1727, 10.1126/science.1090289 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Guruharsha, 2011, A protein complex network of Drosophila melanogaster, Cell, 147, 690, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.047 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hall, 2013, Building phylogenetic trees from molecular data with MEGA, Mol Biol Evol., 30, 1229, 10.1093/molbev/mst012 · DOI
  19. Heliconius Genome Consortium, 2012, Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species, Nature, 487, 94, 10.1038/nature11041 · DOI
  20. Huerta-Cepas, 2010, ETE: a python environment for tree exploration, BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 24, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-24 · DOI
  21. Hughes, 2008, A microtubule interactome: complexes with roles in cell cycle and mitosis, PLoS Biol., 6, e98, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060098 · DOI
  22. Irelan, 2001, Functional redundancies, distinct localizations and interactions among three fission yeast homologs of centromere protein-B, Genetics, 157, 1191, 10.1093/genetics/157.3.1191 · DOI
  23. Katoh, 2013, MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability, Mol Biol Evol., 30, 772, 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Laskowski, 1993, PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures, J Appl Cryst., 26, 283, 10.1107/S0021889892009944 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lorenz, 2012, CENP-B cooperates with Set1 in bidirectional transcriptional silencing and genome organization of retrotransposons, Mol Cell Biol., 32, 4215, 10.1128/MCB.00395-12 · DOI
  26. Louis, 2013, Genomicus: five genome browsers for comparative genomics in eukaryota, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D700, 10.1093/nar/gks1156 · DOI
  27. Maere, 2005, BiNGO: a cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks, Bioinformatics, 21, 3448, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551 · DOI
  28. Maga, 2003, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners, J Cell Sci., 116, 3051, 10.1242/jcs.00653 · DOI
  29. Marshall, 2012, Putative CENP-B paralogues are not present at mammalian centromeres, Chromosoma, 121, 169, 10.1007/s00412-011-0348-3 · DOI
  30. Marygold, 2013, FlyBase: improvements to the bibliography, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D751, 10.1093/nar/gks1024 · DOI
  31. Negoua, 2013, Internal deletions of transposable elements: the case of Lemi elements, Genetica, 141, 369, 10.1007/s10709-013-9736-3 · DOI
  32. Nei, 1986, Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions, Mol Biol Evol., 3, 418
  33. Okada, 2007, CENP-B controls centromere formation depending on the chromatin context, Cell, 131, 1287, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.045 · DOI
  34. Russell, 1992, Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels, Proteins, 14, 309, 10.1002/prot.340140216 · DOI
  35. Sharan, 2007, Network-based prediction of protein function, Mol Syst Biol., 3, 88, 10.1038/msb4100129 · DOI
  36. Sinzelle, 2009, Molecular domestication of transposable elements: from detrimental parasites to useful host genes, Cell Mol Life Sci., 66, 1073, 10.1007/s00018-009-8376-3 · DOI
  37. Smit, 1996, Tiggers and other DNA transposon fossils in the human genome, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 93, 1443, 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1443 · DOI · Paper page
  38. St Pierre, 2013, FlyBase 102— advanced approaches to interrogating FlyBase, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D780, 10.1093/nar/gkt1092 · DOI
  39. Stamatakis, 2014, RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies, Bioinformatics, 30, 1312, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Stanyon, 2004, A Drosophila protein-interaction map centered on cell-cycle regulators, Genome Biol., 5, R96, 10.1186/gb-2004-5-12-r96 · DOI
  41. Tawaramoto, 2003, Crystal structure of the human centromere protein B (CENP-B) dimerization domain at 1.65-A resolution, J Biol Chem., 278, 51454, 10.1074/jbc.M310388200 · DOI
  42. Thompson, 1994, CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice, Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673, 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Titz, 2004, What do we learn from high-throughput protein interaction data?, Expert Rev Proteomics, 1, 111, 10.1586/14789450.1.1.111 · DOI
  44. Tribolium Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2008, The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum, Nature, 452, 949, 10.1038/nature06784 · DOI
  45. Tudor, 1992, The pogo transposable element family of Drosophila melanogaster, Mol Gen Genet., 232, 126, 10.1007/BF00299145 · DOI
  46. Wang, 1999, Pogo transposase contains a putative helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain that recognises a 12 bp sequence within the terminal inverted repeats, Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 455, 10.1093/nar/27.2.455 · DOI
  47. Warbrick, 1998, PCNA binding proteins in Drosophila melanogaster: the analysis of a conserved PCNA binding domain, Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 3925, 10.1093/nar/26.17.3925 · DOI
  48. Wiederstein, 2007, ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W407, 10.1093/nar/gkm290 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wiles, 2010, Building and analyzing protein interactome networks by cross-species comparisons, BMC Syst Biol., 4, 36, 10.1186/1752-0509-4-36 · DOI
  50. Zaratiegui, 2011, CENP-B preserves genome integrity at replication forks paused by retrotransposon LTR, Nature, 469, 112, 10.1038/nature09608 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mateo, L., & González, J.
Venue
Genome Biology and Evolution
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2014-07-24
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
2008-2016
ISSN
1759-6653
DOI
10.1093/gbe/evu153
PMC
PMC4231638
Cited by
44
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review