CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 616

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Protein Complex Network of Drosophila melanogaster

Guruharsha, K.G., Rual, Jean-François, Zhai, Bo, Mintseris, Julian, Vaidya, Pujita, Vaidya, Namita, Beekman, Chapman, Wong, Christina, Rhee, David Y., Cenaj, Odise, McKillip, Emily, Shah, Saumini, Stapleton, Mark, Wan, Kenneth H., Yu, Charles, Parsa, Bayan, Carlson, Joseph W., Chen, Xiao, Kapadia, Bhaveen, VijayRaghavan, K., Gygi, Steven P., Celniker, Susan E., Obar, Robert A., Artavanis-Tsakonas, Spyros·2011·Cell
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.047PMC PMC3319048
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.047

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NCBI Gene collates data from three prior interactome studies.

    “Interacting partners in Drosophila melanogaster were identified in NCBI Gene, which collates data from three prior interactome studies47–49.”

    From Endosomal PI(3)P regulation by the COMMD/CCDC22/CCDC93 (CCC) complex controls membrane protein recycling (2019) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Introduction and Results (‘A Drosophila Protein Interaction Map’; page not provided) establish that this paper is a Drosophila interaction-mapping study, so it fits the citation’s identification of a prior interactome study. Our copy does not say that NCBI Gene collates its data or data from exactly three studies; a separate Results passage describes DroID as consolidating seven sources. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Interaction experiments by unbiased screens in mammalian cells and protein-protein interaction studies in Drosophila produced interactome data that in aggregate includes all the proteins identified experimentally in our mass spectrometry data, including FAM45A as a CCC and retriever binding protein.

    “interaction experiments by unbiased screens in mammalian cells46, as well as protein–protein interaction studies in Drosophila47–49, produced interactome data that in aggregate includes all the proteins identified experimentally in our mass spectrometry data, including the identification of FAM45A as a CCC and retriever binding protein”

    From Endosomal PI(3)P regulation by the COMMD/CCDC22/CCDC93 (CCC) complex controls membrane protein recycling (2019) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. Adams, 2000, The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster, Science, 287, 2185, 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185 · DOI
  2. Audhya, 2007, MVB-12, a fourth subunit of metazoan ESCRT-I, functions in receptor downregulation, PLoS One, 2, e956, 10.1371/journal.pone.0000956 · DOI
  3. Behrends, 2010, Network organization of the human autophagy system, Nature, 466, 68, 10.1038/nature09204 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Belote, 2009, Duplicated proteasome subunit genes in Drosophila and their roles in spermatogenesis, Heredity, 103, 23, 10.1038/hdy.2009.23 · DOI
  5. Bennett, 2006, Towards a comprehensive analysis of the protein phosphatase 1 interactome in Drosophila, J. Mol. Biol., 364, 196, 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.094 · DOI
  6. Bouwmeester, 2004, A physical and functional map of the human TNF-alpha/NF-kappa B signal transduction pathway, Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 97, 10.1038/ncb1086 · DOI
  7. Breitkreutz, 2010, A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast, Science, 328, 1043, 10.1126/science.1176495 · DOI
  8. Cherbas, 2011, The transcriptional diversity of 25 Drosophila cell lines, Genome Res., 21, 301, 10.1101/gr.112961.110 · DOI
  9. Chintapalli, 2007, Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease, Nat. Genet., 39, 715, 10.1038/ng2049 · DOI
  10. Choi, 2011, SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data, Nat. Methods, 8, 70, 10.1038/nmeth.1541 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dombrádi, 1990, Drosophila contains three genes that encode distinct isoforms of protein phosphatase 1, Eur. J. Biochem., 194, 739, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19464.x · DOI
  12. Eng, 2008, A fast SEQUEST cross correlation algorithm, J. Proteome Res., 7, 4598, 10.1021/pr800420s · DOI
  13. Enright, 2002, An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families, Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 1575, 10.1093/nar/30.7.1575 · DOI
  14. Ewing, 2007, Large-scale mapping of human protein-protein interactions by mass spectrometry, Mol. Syst. Biol., 3, 89, 10.1038/msb4100134 · DOI
  15. Forsburg, 2004, Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 68, 109, 10.1128/MMBR.68.1.109-131.2004 · DOI
  16. Freilich, 1999, The COP9 signalosome is essential for development of Drosophila melanogaster, Curr. Biol., 9, 1187, 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80023-8 · DOI
  17. Fricke, 2007, The proteasome maturation protein POMP facilitates major steps of 20S proteasome formation at the endoplasmic reticulum, EMBO Rep., 8, 1170, 10.1038/sj.embor.7401091 · DOI
  18. Gavin, 2011, Recent advances in charting protein-protein interaction: mass spectrometry-based approaches, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 22, 42, 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.09.007 · DOI
  19. Gavin, 2006, Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery, Nature, 440, 631, 10.1038/nature04532 · DOI
  20. Giot, 2003, A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster, Science, 302, 1727, 10.1126/science.1090289 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Goshima, 2010, New look inside the spindle: microtubule-dependent microtubule generation within the spindle, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 22, 44, 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.012 · DOI
  22. Graham, 1977, Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5, J. Gen. Virol., 36, 59, 10.1099/0022-1317-36-1-59 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Graveley, 2011, The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster, Nature, 471, 473, 10.1038/nature09715 · DOI
  24. Guerrero, 2008, Characterization of the proteasome interaction network using a QTAX-based tag-team strategy and protein interaction network analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 13333, 10.1073/pnas.0801870105 · DOI
  25. Hart, 2007, A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality, BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 236, 10.1186/1471-2105-8-236 · DOI
  26. Herold, 2009, Conservation of the protein composition and electron microscopy structure of Drosophila melanogaster and human spliceosomal complexes, Mol. Cell. Biol., 29, 281, 10.1128/MCB.01415-08 · DOI
  27. Ho, 2002, Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry, Nature, 415, 180, 10.1038/415180a · DOI
  28. Hölzl, 2000, The regulatory complex of Drosophila melanogaster 26S proteasomes. Subunit composition and localization of a deubiquitylating enzyme, J. Cell Biol., 150, 119, 10.1083/jcb.150.1.119 · DOI
  29. Huang da, 2009, Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 1, 10.1093/nar/gkn923 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ito, 2001, A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 4569, 10.1073/pnas.061034498 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Jansen, 2002, Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions, Genome Res., 12, 37, 10.1101/gr.205602 · DOI
  32. Kanehisa, 2010, KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D355, 10.1093/nar/gkp896 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kato, 2009, Mammalian COP9 signalosome, Genes Cells, 14, 1209, 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01349.x · DOI
  34. Krogan, 2006, Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nature, 440, 637, 10.1038/nature04670 · DOI
  35. Kühner, 2009, Proteome organization in a genome-reduced bacterium, Science, 326, 1235, 10.1126/science.1176343 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lamesch, 2007, hORFeome v3.1: a resource of human open reading frames representing over 10,000 human genes, Genomics, 89, 307, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.11.012 · DOI
  37. Leggett, 2002, Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function, Mol. Cell, 10, 495, 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00638-X · DOI
  38. Li, 2004, A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans, Science, 303, 540, 10.1126/science.1091403 · DOI
  39. Liu, 2004, A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics, Anal. Chem., 76, 4193, 10.1021/ac0498563 · DOI
  40. Michelet, 2010, Developmental and cellular functions of the ESCRT machinery in pluricellular organisms, Biol. Cell, 102, 191, 10.1042/BC20090145 · DOI
  41. Mintseris, 2005, Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 10930, 10.1073/pnas.0502667102 · DOI
  42. Murali, 2011, DroID 2011: a comprehensive, integrated resource for protein, transcription factor, RNA and gene interactions for Drosophila, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D736, 10.1093/nar/gkq1092 · DOI
  43. Ohtaki, 2010, Structure and function of archaeal prefoldin, a co-chaperone of group II chaperonin, Front. Biosci., 15, 708, 10.2741/3641 · DOI
  44. Rees, 2011, In vivo analysis of proteomes and interactomes using parallel affinity capture (iPAC) coupled to mass spectrometry, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 10, 10.1074/mcp.M110.002386 · DOI
  45. Rual, 2004, Human ORFeome version 1.1: a platform for reverse proteomics, Genome Res., 14, 2128, 10.1101/gr.2973604 · DOI
  46. Rual, 2005, Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network, Nature, 437, 1173, 10.1038/nature04209 · DOI
  47. Shaw, 2002, Preferential transformation of human neuronal cells by human adenoviruses and the origin of HEK 293 cells, FASEB J., 16, 869, 10.1096/fj.01-0995fje · DOI
  48. Sowa, 2009, Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape, Cell, 138, 389, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.042 · DOI
  49. Stanyon, 2004, A Drosophila protein-interaction map centered on cell-cycle regulators, Genome Biol., 5, R96, 10.1186/gb-2004-5-12-r96 · DOI
  50. Stelzl, 2005, A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome, Cell, 122, 957, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.029 · DOI
  51. Südhof, 2009, Membrane fusion: grappling with SNARE and SM proteins, Science, 323, 474, 10.1126/science.1161748 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Thomas, 2003, PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function, Genome Res., 13, 2129, 10.1101/gr.772403 · DOI
  53. Tweedie, 2009, FlyBase: enhancing Drosophila Gene Ontology annotations, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D555, 10.1093/nar/gkn788 · DOI
  54. Uetz, 2000, A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nature, 403, 623, 10.1038/35001009 · DOI · Paper page
  55. van Dam, 2008, Protein complex evolution does not involve extensive network rewiring, PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000132, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000132 · DOI
  56. Wang, 2007, Mass spectrometric characterization of the affinity-purified human 26S proteasome complex, Biochemistry, 46, 3553, 10.1021/bi061994u · DOI · Paper page
  57. Wee, 2002, Conservation of the COP9/signalosome in budding yeast, BMC Genet., 3, 15, 10.1186/1471-2156-3-15 · DOI
  58. Williams, 2004, Prognostic classification of relapsing favorable histology Wilms tumor using cDNA microarray expression profiling and support vector machines, Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 41, 65, 10.1002/gcc.20060 · DOI
  59. Wuchty, 2004, Evolution and topology in the yeast protein interaction network, Genome Res., 14, 1310, 10.1101/gr.2300204 · DOI
  60. Yamada, 2009, Evolution of biomolecular networks: lessons from metabolic and protein interactions, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 10, 791, 10.1038/nrm2787 · DOI
  61. Yu, 2011, Development of expression-ready constructs for generation of proteomic libraries, Methods Mol. Biol., 723, 257, 10.1007/978-1-61779-043-0_17 · DOI
  62. Yu, 2008, DroID: the Drosophila Interactions Database, a comprehensive resource for annotated gene and protein interactions, BMC Genomics, 9, 461, 10.1186/1471-2164-9-461 · DOI
  63. Bader, G.D., and Hogue, C.W. (2002). Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 991–997. · DOI
  64. Behrends, C., Sowa, M.E., Gygi, S.P., and Harper, J.W. (2010). Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature 466, 68–76. · DOI · Paper page
  65. Breitkreutz, A., Choi, H., Sharom, J.R., Boucher, L., Neduva, V., Larsen, B., Lin, Z.Y., Breitkreutz, B.J., Stark, C., Liu, G., et al. (2010). A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast. Science 328, 1043–1046. · DOI
  66. Bunch, T.A., Grinblat, Y., and Goldstein, L.S. (1988). Characterization and use of the Drosophila metallothionein promoter in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 1043–1061. · DOI
  67. Cherbas, L., Willingham, A., Zhang, D., Yang, L., Zou, Y., Eads, B.D., Carlson, J.W., Landolin, J.M., Kapranov, P., Dumais, J., et al. (2011). The transcriptional diversity of 25 Drosophila cell lines. Genome Res. 21, 301–314. · DOI
  68. Chick, J.M., Haynes, P.A., Molloy, M.P., Bjellqvist, B., Baker, M.S., and Len, A.C. (2008). Characterization of the rat liver membrane proteome using peptide immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing. J. Proteome Res. 7, 1036–1045. · DOI
  69. Chintapalli, V.R., Wang, J., and Dow, J.A. (2007). Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat. Genet. 39, 715–720. · DOI
  70. Choi, H., Larsen, B., Lin, Z.Y., Breitkreutz, A., Mellacheruvu, D., Fermin, D., Qin, Z.S., Tyers, M., Gingras, A.C., and Nesvizhskii, A.I. (2011). SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat. Methods 8, 70–73. · DOI · Paper page
  71. Cline, M.S., Smoot, M., Cerami, E., Kuchinsky, A., Landys, N., Workman, C., Christmas, R., Avila-Campilo, I., Creech, M., Gross, B., et al. (2007). Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2366–2382. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Croft, D., O'Kelly, G., Wu, G., Haw, R., Gillespie, M., Matthews, L., Caudy, M., Garapati, P., Gopinath, G., Jassal, B., et al. (2011). Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D691–D697. · DOI · Paper page
  73. Eng, J.K., Fischer, B., Grossmann, J., and Maccoss, M.J. (2008). A fast SEQUEST cross correlation algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 7, 4598–4602. · DOI
  74. Enright, A.J., Van Dongen, S., and Ouzounis, C.A. (2002). An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1575–1584. · DOI
  75. Gavin, A.C., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., Krause, R., Boesche, M., Marzioch, M., Rau, C., Jensen, L.J., Bastuck, S., Dumpelfeld, B., et al. (2006). Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631–636. · DOI
  76. Graveley, B.R., Brooks, A.N., Carlson, J.W., Duff, M.O., Landolin, J.M., Yang, L., Artieri, C.G., van Baren, M.J., Boley, N., Booth, B.W., et al. (2011). The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471, 473–479. · DOI
  77. Hart, G.T., Lee, I., and Marcotte, E.R. (2007). A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 236. · DOI
  78. Huang da, W., Sherman, B.T., and Lempicki, R.A. (2009). Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Huttlin, E.L., Jedrychowski, M.P., Elias, J.E., Goswami, T., Rad, R., Beausoleil, S.A., Villen, J., Haas, W., Sowa, M.E., and Gygi, S.P. (2010). A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174–1189. · DOI · Paper page
  80. Jansen, R., Greenbaum, D., and Gerstein, M. (2002). Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12, 37–46. · DOI
  81. Krogan, N.J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., Ignatchenko, A., Li, J., Pu, S., Datta, N., Tikuisis, A.P., et al. (2006). Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637–643. · DOI
  82. Lamesch, P., Li, N., Milstein, S., Fan, C., Hao, T., Szabo, G., Hu, Z., Venkatesan, K., Bethel, G., Martin, P., et al. (2007). hORFeome v3.1: a resource of human open reading frames representing over 10,000 human genes. Genomics 89, 307–315. · DOI
  83. Matthews, L., Gopinath, G., Gillespie, M., Caudy, M., Croft, D., de Bono, B., Garapati, P., Hemish, J., Hermjakob, H., Jassal, B., et al. (2009). Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D619–D622. · DOI · Paper page
  84. Mewes, H.W., Amid, C., Arnold, R., Frishman, D., Guldener, U., Mannhaupt, G., Munsterkotter, M., Pagel, P., Strack, N., Stumpflen, V., et al. (2004). MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D41–D44. · DOI
  85. Ostlund, G., Schmitt, T., Forslund, K., Kostler, T., Messina, D.N., Roopra, S., Frings, O., and Sonnhammer, E.L. (2010). InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D196–D203. · DOI · Paper page
  86. Pu, S., Vlasblom, J., Emili, A., Greenblatt, J., and Wodak, S.J. (2007). Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics 7, 944–960. · DOI
  87. Pu, S., Wong, J., Turner, B., Cho, E., and Wodak, S.J. (2009). Up-to-date catalogs of yeast protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 825–831. · DOI
  88. Rual, J.F., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Hao, T., Bertin, N., Li, S., Dricot, A., Li, N., Rosenberg, J., Lamesch, P., Vidalain, P.O., et al. (2004). Human ORFeome version 1.1: a platform for reverse proteomics. Genome Res. 14, 2128–2135. · DOI
  89. Ruepp, A., Brauner, B., Dunger-Kaltenbach, I., Frishman, G., Montrone, C., Stransky, M., Waegele, B., Schmidt, T., Doudieu, O.N., Stumpflen, V., et al. (2008). CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D646–D650. · DOI
  90. Sharan, R., Suthram, S., Kelley, R.M., Kuhn, T., McCuine, S., Uetz, P., Sittler, T., Karp, R.M., and Ideker, T. (2005). Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1974–1979. · DOI
  91. Sowa, M.E., Bennett, E.J., Gygi, S.P., and Harper, J.W. (2009). Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 138, 389–403. · DOI
  92. Storey, J.D., and Tibshirani, R. (2003). Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445. · DOI · Paper page
  93. Torres, E.M., Dephoure, N., Panneerselvam, A., Tucker, C.M., Whittaker, C.A., Gygi, S.P., Dunham, M.J., and Amon, A. (2010). Identification of aneuploidy-tolerating mutations. Cell 143, 71–83. · DOI
  94. Veraksa, A., Bauer, A., and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (2005). Analyzing protein complexes in Drosophila with tandem affinity purification-mass spectrometry. Dev. Dyn. 232, 827–834. · DOI
  95. Villarino, M.B. (2005). The Probability of a Run. arXiv math/0511652. · arXiv
  96. Villen, J., and Gygi, S.P. (2008). The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1630–1638. · DOI
  97. Yanagawa, S., Lee, J.S., and Ishimoto, A. (1998). Identification and characterization of a novel line of Drosophila Schneider S2 cells that respond to wingless signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32353–32359. · DOI
  98. Yu, C., Wan, K.H., Hammonds, A.S., Stapleton, M., Carlson, J.W., and Celniker, S.E. (2011). Development of expression-ready constructs for generation of proteomic libraries. Methods Mol. Biol. 723, 257–272. · DOI
  99. Zybailov, B., Mosley, A.L., Sardiu, M.E., Coleman, M.K., Florens, L., and Washburn, M.P. (2006). Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res. 5, 2339–2347. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guruharsha, K. G., Rual, J.-F., Zhai, B., Mintseris, J., Vaidya, P., Vaidya, N., Beekman, C., Wong, C., Rhee, D. Y., Cenaj, O., McKillip, E., Shah, S., Stapleton, M., Wan, K. H., Yu, C., Parsa, B., Carlson, J. W., Chen, X., Kapadia, B., VijayRaghavan, K., Gygi, S. P., Celniker, S. E., Obar, R. A., & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
147
Issue
3
Pages
690-703
ISSN
0092-8674
DOI
10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.047
PMC
PMC3319048
Cited by
616
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review