Cited by 1,863

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster

Giot, L., Bader, J. S., Brouwer, C., Chaudhuri, A., Kuang, B., Li, Y., Hao, Y. L., Ooi, C. E., Godwin, B., Vitols, E., Vijayadamodar, G., Pochart, P., Machineni, H., Welsh, M., Kong, Y., Zerhusen, B., Malcolm, R., Varrone, Z., Collis, A., Minto, M., Burgess, S., McDaniel, L., Stimpson, E., Spriggs, F., Williams, J., Neurath, K., Ioime, N., Agee, M., Voss, E., Furtak, K., Renzulli, R., Aanensen, N., Carrolla, S., Bickelhaupt, E., Lazovatsky, Y., DaSilva, A., Zhong, J., Stanyon, C. A., Finley, R. L., White, K. P., Braverman, M., Jarvie, T., Gold, S., Leach, M., Knight, J., Shimkets, R. A., McKenna, M. P., Chant, J., Rothberg, J. M.·2003·Science

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster is a proven model system for many aspects of human biology. Here we present a two-hybrid–based protein-interaction map of the fly proteome. A total of 10,623 predicted transcripts were isolated and screened against standard and normalized complementary DNA libraries to produce a draft map of 7048 proteins and 20,405 interactions. A computational method of rating two-hybrid interaction confidence was developed to refine this draft map to a higher confidence map of 4679 proteins and 4780 interactions. Statistical modeling of the network showed two levels of organization: a short-range organization, presumably corresponding to multiprotein complexes, and a more global organization, presumably corresponding to intercomplex connections. The network recapitulated known pathways, extended pathways, and uncovered previously unknown pathway components. This map serves as a starting point for a systems biology modeling of multicellular organisms, including humans.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1090289

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interaction experiments by unbiased screens in mammalian cells and protein-protein interaction studies in Drosophila produced interactome data that in aggregate includes all the proteins identified experimentally in our mass spectrometry data, including FAM45A as a CCC and retriever binding protein.

    “interaction experiments by unbiased screens in mammalian cells46, as well as protein–protein interaction studies in Drosophila47–49, produced interactome data that in aggregate includes all the proteins identified experimentally in our mass spectrometry data, including the identification of FAM45A as a CCC and retriever binding protein”
  • NCBI Gene collates data from three prior interactome studies.

    “Interacting partners in Drosophila melanogaster were identified in NCBI Gene, which collates data from three prior interactome studies47–49.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1038/nature01512 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.061034498 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/35001009 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.287.5461.2222 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.0735871100 · DOI
  7. J. S. Bader A. Chaudhuri J. Chant Nature Biotechnol. in press.
  8. 10.1038/415141a · DOI
  9. 10.1038/415180a · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1065103 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4920 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/35075138 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/gr.169101 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5262 · DOI
  16. A. J. Courey, S. Jia, Genes Dev.15, 2786 (2001). · DOI
  17. 10.1128/MCB.19.3.2080 · DOI
  18. G. Jimenez, A. Guichet, A. Ephrussi, J. Casanova, Genes Dev.14, 224 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/1521-1878(200102)23:2<125::AID-BIES1019>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  20. 10.1002/bies.10207 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00750-X · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80289-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1101/gad.6.12b.2569 · DOI
  24. 10.1101/gad.10.16.2089 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.94.1.115 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01437-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1074/jbc.M205526200 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00147-8 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90170-U · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.M212430200 · DOI
  31. 10.1074/jbc.M204130200 · DOI
  32. 10.3109/15419060109080737 · DOI
  33. 10.1074/jbc.M004007200 · DOI
  34. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.435 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80404-3 · DOI
  36. E. T. Kipreos M. Pagano Genome Biol.1 REVIEWS3002 (2000). · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80403-1 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80098-7 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/ncb800 · DOI
  40. 10.1101/gad.11.1.94 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00104-6 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/35060126 · DOI
  43. 10.1074/jbc.M205254200 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00658-3 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00664-9 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00745-4 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/ni0202-121 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01214-9 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81735-3 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1073/pnas.93.10.5025 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80507-3 · DOI
  52. 10.1128/MCB.22.19.6854-6865.2002 · DOI
  53. 10.1242/dev.127.8.1715 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Giot, L., Bader, J. S., Brouwer, C., Chaudhuri, A., Kuang, B., Li, Y., Hao, Y. L., Ooi, C. E., Godwin, B., Vitols, E., Vijayadamodar, G., Pochart, P., Machineni, H., Welsh, M., Kong, Y., Zerhusen, B., Malcolm, R., Varrone, Z., Collis, A., Minto, M., Burgess, S., McDaniel, L., Stimpson, E., Spriggs, F., Williams, J., Neurath, K., Ioime, N., Agee, M., Voss, E., Furtak, K., Renzulli, R., Aanensen, N., Carrolla, S., Bickelhaupt, E., Lazovatsky, Y., DaSilva, A., Zhong, J., Stanyon, C. A., Finley, R. L., White, K. P., Braverman, M., Jarvie, T., Gold, S., Leach, M., Knight, J., Shimkets, R. A., McKenna, M. P., Chant, J., & Rothberg, J. M.
Venue
Science
Published
2003-12-05
Volume
302
Issue
5651
Pages
1727-1736
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
1,863
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review