The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency.
Abstract
The temporal method for estimating effective population size (Ne) from the standardized variance in allele frequency change (F) is presented in a generalized form. Whereas previous treatments of this method have adopted rather limiting assumptions, the present analysis shows that the temporal method is generally applicable to a wide variety of organisms. Use of a revised model of gene sampling permits a more generalized interpretation of Ne than that used by some other authors studying this method. It is shown that two sampling plans (individuals for genetic analysis taken before or after reproduction) whose differences have been stressed by previous authors can be treated in a uniform way. Computer simulations using a wide variety of initial conditions show that different formulas for computing F have much less effect on Ne than do sample size (S), number of generations between samples (t), or the number of loci studied (L). Simulation results also indicate that (1) bias of F is small unless alleles with very low frequency are used; (2) precision is typically increased by about the same amount with a doubling of S, t, or L; (3) confidence intervals for Ne computed using a chi 2 approximation are accurate and unbiased under most conditions; (4) the temporal method is best suited for use with organisms having high juvenile mortality and, perhaps, a limited effective population size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers
Balloux, F., & Lugon‐Moulin, N. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01436.x · Cited by 1,208
Waples, R. S., & Do, C. (2010) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00104.x · Cited by 991
Self-citationThe inflated significance of neutral genetic diversity in conservation genetics
Teixeira, J. C., & Huber, C. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2015096118 · Cited by 474
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Lucchini, V., Galov, A., & Randi, E. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02077.x · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Waples, R. S.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-02-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-391
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2131700426
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/121.2.379
- The paper
- Waples, R. S. (1989). A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/121.2.379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.