The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers
Open accessAbstract
Microsatellite markers are routinely used to investigate the genetic structuring of natural populations. The knowledge of how genetic variation is partitioned among populations may have important implications not only in evolutionary biology and ecology, but also in conservation biology. Hence, reliable estimates of population differentiation are crucial to understand the connectivity among populations and represent important tools to develop conservation strategies. The estimation of differentiation is c from Wright’s FST and/or Slatkin’s RST, an FST‐analogue assuming a stepwise mutation model. Both these statistics have their drawbacks. Furthermore, there is no clear consensus over their relative accuracy. In this review, we first discuss the consequences of different temporal and spatial sampling strategies on differentiation estimation. Then, we move to statistical problems directly associated with the estimation of population structuring itself, with particular emphasis on the effects of high mutation rates and mutation patterns of microsatellite loci. Finally, we discuss the biological interpretation of population structuring estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
ESTIMATING F -STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE
Weir, B. S., & Cockerham, C. C. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x · Cited by 19,066
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics
Nei, M. (1987) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/nei-92038 · Cited by 15,271
Genetic Distance between Populations
Nei, M. (1972) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282771 · Cited by 9,731
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
Wright, S. (1931) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · Cited by 8,916
Analysis of Gene Diversity in Subdivided Populations
Nei, M. (1973) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321 · Cited by 8,885
THE GENETICAL STRUCTURE OF POPULATIONS
WRIGHT, S. (1949) · Annals of Eugenics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x · Cited by 6,753
Wright, S. (1943) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/28.2.114 · Cited by 5,479
ROGERS, S. M., & BERNATCHEZ, L. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02396.x · Cited by 5,088
Cited by
G ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation
JOST, L. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03887.x · Cited by 2,435
The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation
Sommer, S. (2005) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-2-16 · Cited by 913
UNDERWOOD, J. N., SMITH, L. D., VAN OPPEN, M. J. H., & GILMOUR, J. P. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03187.x · Cited by 231
Molecular Systematics of Anopheles: From Subgenera to Subpopulations
Krzywinski, J., & Besansky, N. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112647 · Cited by 169
Ecologically relevant dispersal of corals on isolated reefs: implications for managing resilience
Underwood, J. N., Smith, L. D., Oppen, M. J. H. V., & Gilmour, J. P. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-1461.1 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Balloux, F., & Lugon‐Moulin, N.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01-31
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-165
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2088583473
- Cited by
- 1,208
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 22.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01436.x
- The paper
- Balloux, F., & Lugon‐Moulin, N. (2002). The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01436.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.