The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte.
Abstract
Molecular marker loci were used to investigate the inheritance of morphological traits that distinguish maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) from a closely related wild relative, teosinte (Z. mays ssp. mexicana). Regression and interval mapping analyses gave largely congruent results concerning the numbers of loci controlling the morphological traits and the magnitudes of their effects; however, interval mapping tended to give larger estimates for the magnitudes of the effects of the morphological trait loci. This tendency was exaggerated for traits that were non-normally distributed. Variation for most inflorescence traits is controlled by one or two regions of the genome with large effects plus several other regions with relatively small effects. As such, the data are congruent with a mode of inheritance for most traits involving one or two major loci plus several minor loci. Regions of the genome with large effects on one trait consistently had smaller effects on several other traits, possibly as a result of pleiotropy. Most of the variation for the dramatic differences in inflorescence morphology between maize and teosinte is explained by five restricted regions of the genome. One of these regions encompasses a previously described gene, tb1 (teosinte branched), and the effects of this region on inflorescence architecture are similar to the known effects of tb1. Implications of this work for the genetic basis of morphological evolution in plants are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EVOLUTIONARY QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW?
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1989) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005 · Cited by 686
Cited by
The Genetic Architecture of Quantitative Traits
Mackay, T. F. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090633 · Cited by 1,106
PERSPECTIVE: EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY AND THE PROBLEM OF VARIATION
Stern, D. L. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00544.x · Cited by 483
Kebrom, T. H., Burson, B. L., & Finlayson, S. A. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.074856 · Cited by 280
Architectural Evolution and its Implications for Domestication in Grasses
Doust, A. (2007) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcm040 · Cited by 132
The genetic architecture of domestication in the chicken: effects of pleiotropy and linkage
WRIGHT, D., RUBIN, C. ‐., MARTINEZ BARRIO, A., SCHÜTZ, K., KERJE, S., BRÄNDSTRÖM, H., KINDMARK, A., JENSEN, P., & ANDERSSON, L. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04882.x · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Doebley, J., & Stec, A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-09-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 285-295
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2098499635
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.