The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.
Abstract
It is argued that the bias in synonymous codon usage observed in unicellular organisms is due to a balance between the forces of selection and mutation in a finite population, with greater bias in highly expressed genes reflecting stronger selection for efficiency of translation. A population genetic model is developed taking into account population size and selective differences between synonymous codons. A biochemical model is then developed to predict the magnitude of selective differences between synonymous codons in unicellular organisms in which growth rate (or possibly growth yield) can be equated with fitness. Selection can arise from differences in either the speed or the accuracy of translation. A model for the effect of speed of translation on fitness is considered in detail, a similar model for accuracy more briefly. The model is successful in predicting a difference in the degree of bias at the beginning than in the rest of the gene under some circumstances, as observed in Escherichia coli, but grossly overestimates the amount of bias expected. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay
Hanson, G., & Coller, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.91 · Cited by 825
Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation
Lynch, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0912629107 · Cited by 792
Rate-Limiting Steps in Yeast Protein Translation
Shah, P., Ding, Y., Niemczyk, M., Kudla, G., & Plotkin, J. B. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.049 · Cited by 463
Weinberg, D. E., Shah, P., Eichhorn, S. W., Hussmann, J. A., Plotkin, J. B., & Bartel, D. P. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.043 · Cited by 392
Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living
Kapheim, K. M., Pan, H., Li, C., Salzberg, S. L., Puiu, D., Magoc, T., Robertson, H. M., Hudson, M. E., Venkat, A., Fischman, B. J., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4788 · Cited by 409
McVean, G. A. T., & Charlesworth, B. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.929 · Cited by 336
Genetic code flexibility in microorganisms: novel mechanisms and impact on physiology
Ling, J., O'Donoghue, P., & Söll, D. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3568 · Cited by 135
Distribution of the strength of selection against amino acid replacements in human proteins.
Yampolsky, L. Y., Kondrashov, F. A., & Kondrashov, A. S. (2005) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi350 · Cited by 95
A Major Controversy in Codon-Anticodon Adaptation Resolved by a New Codon Usage Index
Xia, X. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.172106 · Cited by 67
Estimating selection on synonymous codon usage from noisy experimental data
Wallace, E. W. J., Airoldi, E. M., & Drummond, D. A. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst051 · Cited by 48
Farookhi, H., & Xia, X. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12040768 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulmer, M.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-11-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 897-907
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2157848631
- Cited by
- 1,017
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.