Cited by 464RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Rate-Limiting Steps in Yeast Protein Translation

Open access
Shah, Premal, Ding, Yang, Niemczyk, Malwina, Kudla, Grzegorz, Plotkin, Joshua B.·2013·Cell

Abstract

Deep sequencing now provides detailed snapshots of ribosome occupancy on mRNAs. We leverage these data to parameterize a computational model of translation, keeping track of every ribosome, tRNA, and mRNA molecule in a yeast cell. We determine the parameter regimes in which fast initiation or high codon bias in a transgene increases protein yield and infer the initiation rates of endogenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes, which vary by several orders of magnitude and correlate with 5' mRNA folding energies. Our model recapitulates the previously reported 5'-to-3' ramp of decreasing ribosome densities, although our analysis shows that this ramp is caused by rapid initiation of short genes rather than slow codons at the start of transcripts. We conclude that protein production in healthy yeast cells is typically limited by the availability of free ribosomes, whereas protein production under periods of stress can sometimes be rescued by reducing initiation or elongation rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.049

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have shown that protein expression level drops if the 5′-end leader region has more secondary structure.

    “Some studies have shown that protein expression level drops if the 5′-end leader region has more secondary structure5,50–53.”

    From Algorithm for optimized mRNA design improves stability and immunogenicity (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results section (‘Initiation Probabilities of Endogenous Genes’; page not provided) says strong 5′ mRNA structure reduces initiation and reports an experimental link between 5′ folding and protein levels in yeast. But the paper measures folding across nucleotides −4 to +37, mostly within the coding sequence, so it does not establish the claim specifically for secondary structure in the 5′ leader region. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Highly structured 5' UTRs, such as dengue virus (DEN2), can support efficient translation, contrary to previous reports.

    “Most surprising, in contrast to previous reports47–49, we found 5’ UTRs that are highly structured, such as the dengue virus (DEN2), can support efficient translation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tuller T. Carmi A. Vestsigian K. Navon S. Dorfan Y. Zaborske J. Pan T. Dahan O. Furman I. Pilpel Y. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation Cell 141 2010 344 354 20403328

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, P., Ding, Y., Niemczyk, M., Kudla, G., & Plotkin, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
Plotkin, Joshua B.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
153
Issue
7
Pages
1589-1601
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011503994
Cited by
463
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 9
FWCI
18.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Army Research Office (D12AP00025, W911NF-12-1-0552)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • U.S. Department of the Interior
  • Wellcome Trust (077248)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (RFP-12-16)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
mRNA translation, ribosome occupancy, translation initiation rate, codon usage bias, free ribosomes, protein production, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, tRNA availability, stress response
MeSH terms
Codon, Markov Chains, Models, Genetic, Ribosomes, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Transfer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Protein Biosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review