The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster.
Open accessAbstract
P element mutagenesis was used to construct 94 third chromosome lines of Drosophila melanogaster which contained on average 3.1 stable P element inserts, in an inbred host strain background previously free of P elements. The homozygous and heterozygous effects of the inserts on viability and abdominal and sternopleural bristle number were ascertained by comparing the chromosome lines with inserts to insert-free control lines of the inbred host strain. P elements reduced average homozygous viability by 12.2% per insert and average heterozygous viability by 5.5% per insert, and induced recessive lethal mutations at a rate of 3.8% per insert. Mutational variation for the bristle traits averaged over both sexes was 0.03Ve per homozygous P insert and 0.003Ve per heterozygous P insert, where Ve is the environmental variance. Mutational variation was greater for the sexes considered separately because inserts had large pleiotropic effects on sex dimorphism of bristle characters. The distributions of homozygous effects of inserts on the bristle traits were asymmetrical, with the largest effects in the direction of reducing bristle number; and highly leptokurtic, with most of the increase in variance contributed by a few lines with large effects. The inserts had partially recessive effects on the bristle traits. Insert lines with extreme bristle effects had on average greatly reduced viability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EVOLUTIONARY QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW?
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1989) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005 · Cited by 686
Cited by
The Genetic Architecture of Quantitative Traits
Mackay, T. F. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090633 · Cited by 1,106
Self-citationMutation Accumulation and the Extinction of Small Populations
Lynch, M., Conery, J., & Burger, R. (1995) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285812 · Cited by 1,049
Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome.
Boyko, A. R., Williamson, S. H., Indap, A. R., Degenhardt, J. D., Hernandez, R. D., Lohmueller, K. E., Adams, M. D., Schmidt, S., Sninsky, J. J., Sunyaev, S. R., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000083 · Cited by 628
A Quantitative-Genetic Perspective on Conservation Issues
Lynch, M. (1996) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2504-9_15 · Cited by 403
The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent
Loewe, L., & Hill, W. G. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0317 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackay, T. F., Lyman, R. F., & Jackson, M. S.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-02-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-332
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1877460931
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/130.2.315
- The paper
- Mackay, T. F., Lyman, R. F., & Jackson, M. S. (1992). Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/130.2.315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.