The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits.
Open accessAbstract
We have accumulated spontaneous mutations in the absence of natural selection in Drosophila melanogaster by backcrossing 200 heterozygous replicates of a single high fitness second chromosome to a balancer stock for 44 generations. At generations 33 and 44 of accumulation, we extracted samples of chromosomes and assayed their homozygous performance for female fecundity early and late in adult life, male and female longevity, male mating ability early and late in adult life, productivity (a measure of fecundity times viability) and body weight. The variance among lines increased significantly for all traits except male mating ability and weight. The rate of increase in variance was similar to that found in previous studies of egg-to-adult viability, when calculated relative to trait means. The mutational correlations among traits were all strongly positive. Many correlations were significantly different from 0, while none was significantly different from 1. These data suggest that the mutation-accumulation hypothesis is not a sufficient explanation for the evolution of senescence in D. melanogaster. Mutation-selection balance does seem adequate to explain a substantial proportion of the additive genetic variance for fecundity and longevity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
EVOLUTIONARY QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW?
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1989) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005 · Cited by 686
Cited by
The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0207 · Cited by 1,455
Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations
YODER, J. B., CLANCEY, E., DES ROCHES, S., EASTMAN, J. M., GENTRY, L., GODSOE, W., HAGEY, T. J., JOCHIMSEN, D., OSWALD, B. P., ROBERTSON, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02029.x · Cited by 731
The evolution of trade‐offs: where are we?
ROFF, D. A., & FAIRBAIRN, D. J. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01255.x · Cited by 697
The evolutionary genetics of personality
Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.629 · Cited by 610
Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits
JENNIONS, M. D., & PETRIE, M. (2000) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1999.tb00040.x · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Houle, D., Hughes, K. A., Hoffmaster, D. K., Ihara, J., Assimacopoulos, S., Canada, D., & Charlesworth, B.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 773-785
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2143989469
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/138.3.773
- The paper
- Houle, D., Hughes, K. A., Hoffmaster, D. K., Ihara, J., Assimacopoulos, S., Canada, D., & Charlesworth, B. (1994). The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/138.3.773
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.