The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Isolation of Arabidopsis Mutants With Enhanced Disease Susceptibility by Direct Screening
Open accessAbstract
To discover which components of plant defense responses make significant contributions to limiting pathogen attack, we screened a mutagenized population of Arabidopsis thalzana for individuals that exhibit increased susceptibility to the moderately virulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 (Psm ES4326). The 12 enhanced disease susceptibility (eds) mutants isolated included alleles of two genes involved in phytoalexin biosynthesis (pad2, which had been identified previously, and pad4, which had not been identified previously), two alleles of the previously identified npr1 gene, which affects expression of other defense genes, and alleles of seven previously unidentified genes of unknown function. The npr-1 mutations caused greatly reduced expression of the PRI gene in response to PsmES4326 infection, but had little effect on expression of two other defense genes, BGL2 and PR5, suggesting that PR1 expression may be important for limiting growth of PsmES4326. While direct screens for mutants with quantitative pathogen-susceptibility phenotypes have not been reported previously, our finding that mutants isolated in this way include those affected in known defense responses supports the notion that this type of screening strategy allows genetic dissection of the roles of various plant defense responses in disease resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Durrant, W. E., & Dong, X. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 · Cited by 3,184
Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense
Kunkel, B. N., & Brooks, D. M. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00275-3 · Cited by 1,451
Death Don't Have No Mercy: Cell Death Programs in Plant-Microbe Interactions.
Dangl, J. L., Dietrich, R. A., & Richberg, M. H. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1793 · Cited by 873
Nawrath, C., & Métraux, J.-P. (1999) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.11.8.1393 · Cited by 834
Aarts, N., Metz, M., Holub, E., Staskawicz, B. J., Daniels, M. J., & Parker, J. E. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.17.10306 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Glazebrook, J., Rogers, E. E., & Ausubel, F. M.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-06-01
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 973-982
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1942665378
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation of Arabidopsis Mutants With Enhanced Disease Susceptibility by Direct Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/143.2.973
- The paper
- Glazebrook, J., Rogers, E. E., & Ausubel, F. M. (1996). Isolation of Arabidopsis Mutants With Enhanced Disease Susceptibility by Direct Screening. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/143.2.973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.