The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular Evolution Between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Reduced Codon Bias, Faster Rates of Amino Acid Substitution, and Larger Proteins in D. melanogaster
Abstract
Both natural selection and mutational biases contribute to variation in codon usage bias within Drosophila species. This study addresses the cause of codon bias differences between the sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Under a model of mutation-selection-drift, variation in mutational processes between species predicts greater base composition differences in neutrally evolving regions than in highly biased genes. Variation in selection intensity, however, predicts larger base composition differences in highly biased loci. Greater differences in the G+C content of 34 coding regions than 46 intron sequences between D. melanogaster and D. simulans suggest that D. melanogaster has undergone a reduction in selection intensity for codon bias. Computer simulations suggest at least a fivefold reduction in Nes at silent sites in this lineage. Other classes of molecular change show lineage effects between these species. Rates of amino acid substitution are higher in the D. melanogaster lineage than in D. simulans in 14 genes for which outgroup sequences are available. Surprisingly, protein sizes are larger in D. melanogaster than in D. simulans in the 34 genes compared between the two species. A substantial fraction of silent, replacement, and insertion/deletion mutations in coding regions may be weakly selected in Drosophila.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals
Chamary, J. V., Parmley, J. L., & Hurst, L. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1770 · Cited by 831
The genomic rate of adaptive evolution
EYREWALKER, A. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.015 · Cited by 316
Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution
Akashi, H. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.4.1291 · Cited by 245
Self-citationIntraspecific variation in symbiont genomes: bottlenecks and the aphid-buchnera association
Funk, D. J., Wernegreen, J. J., & Moran, N. A. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.2.477 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Akashi, H.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-11-01
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1297-1307
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1918537068
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Evolution Between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Reduced Codon Bias, Faster Rates of Amino Acid Substitution, and Larger Proteins in D. melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/144.3.1297
- The paper
- Akashi, H. (1996). Molecular Evolution Between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Reduced Codon Bias, Faster Rates of Amino Acid Substitution, and Larger Proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/144.3.1297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.