The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“Break Copy” Duplication: A Model for Chromosome Fragment Formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Open accessAbstract
Introduction of a chromosome fragmentation vector (CFV) into the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in a targeted homologous recombination event that yields an independently segregating chromosome fragment (CF) and an alteration in the strain's karyotype. Fragmentation with an acentric CFV directed in a centromere-proximal orientation generates a CF that contains all sequences proximal to the targeting segment and results in loss of the endogenous targeted chromosome to yield a 2N-1+CF karyotype. In contrast, fragmentation with a centric CFV directed in a centromere-distal orientation generates a CF that contains all sequences distal to the targeting segment and retention of the endogenous targeted chromosome to yield a 2N+CF karyotype. We have termed this phenomenon “break copy” duplication. Using yeast strains in which the centromere had been transposed to a new location, it was demonstrated that the centromere inhibited break copy duplication. These data suggest that CF formation is the product of an unscheduled DNA replication event initiated by the free end of the CFV and is analogous to a “half” double-strand break gap-repair reaction. We suggest that break copy duplication may have evolved as a mechanism for maintenance of ploidy following DNA breakage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
The importance of repairing stalled replication forks
Cox, M. M., Goodman, M. F., Kreuzer, K. N., Sherratt, D. J., Sandler, S. J., & Marians, K. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35003501 · Cited by 1,044
Hastings, P. J., Ira, G., & Lupski, J. R. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000327 · Cited by 818
Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders
Carvalho, C. M. B., & Lupski, J. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2015.25 · Cited by 774
An isochromosome confers drug resistance in vivo by amplification of two genes, ERG11 and TAC1
Selmecki, A., Gerami‐Nejad, M., Paulson, C., Forche, A., & Berman, J. (2008) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06176.x · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrow, D. M., Connelly, C., & Hieter, P.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 371-382
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1758844431
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Break Copy” Duplication: A Model for Chromosome Fragment Formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/147.2.371
- The paper
- Morrow, D. M., Connelly, C., & Hieter, P. (1997). “Break Copy” Duplication: A Model for Chromosome Fragment Formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/147.2.371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.