Cited by 325Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

An isochromosome confers drug resistance in vivo by amplification of two genes, ERG11 and TAC1

Open access
Selmecki, Anna, Gerami‐Nejad, Maryam, Paulson, Carsten, Forche, Anja, Berman, Judith·2008·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Acquired azole resistance is a serious clinical problem that is often associated with the appearance of aneuploidy and, in particular, with the formation of an isochromosome [i(5L)] in the fungal opportunist Candida albicans. Here we exploited a series of isolates from an individual patient during the rapid acquisition of fluconazole resistance (Flu(R)). Comparative genome hybridization arrays revealed that the presence of two extra copies of Chr5L, on the isochromosome, conferred increased Flu(R) and that partial truncation of Chr5L reduced Flu(R). In vitro analysis of the strains by telomere-mediated truncations and by gene deletion assessed the contribution of all Chr5L genes and of four specific genes. Importantly, ERG11 (encoding the drug target) and a hyperactive allele of TAC1 (encoding a transcriptional regulator of drug efflux pumps) made independent, additive contributions to Flu(R) in a gene copy number-dependent manner that was not different from the contributions of the entire Chr5L arm. Thus, the major mechanism by which i(5L) formation causes increased azole resistance is by amplifying two genes: ERG11 and TAC1.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06176.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in clinical isolates have implicated multiple mechanisms in resistance, but have focused on large-scale aberrations or candidate genes, and do not comprehensively chart the genetic basis of adaptation.

    “Studies in clinical isolates have implicated multiple mechanisms in resistance, but have focused on large-scale aberrations or candidate genes, and do not comprehensively chart the genetic basis of adaptation.”

    From The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. (2015) · cites this paper as Selmecki et al., 2008

  • The i5(L) aneuploidy results in increased dosage of genes encoding both the azole target Erg11 and the transcription factor regulating drug efflux, Tac1.

    “This aneuploidy results in increased dosage of genes encoding both the azole target Erg11 and the transcription factor regulating drug efflux, Tac163.”

    From Molecular mechanisms governing antifungal drug resistance (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

  • i(5L) can arise rapidly under fluconazole selection, occurs in diverse genetic backgrounds of Candida albicans, and frequently results in multi-azole resistance.

    “i(5L) can arise rapidly under FLC selection, occurs in diverse genetic backgrounds of C. albicans, and frequently results in multi-azole resistance (Selmecki et al. 2008, 2009).”
  • Isochromosome 5L (i(5L)) causes drug resistance via an increase in the copy number of ERG11 and TAC1.

    “One specific segmental aneuploidy, isochromosome 5L (i(5L)), causes drug resistance via an increase in the copy number of ERG11 and TAC1 (Selmecki et al. 2006, 2008).”
  • The isochromosome 5L region carries the ERG11 and TAC1 genes involved, respectively, in ergosterol synthesis and drug efflux.

    “This region carries the ERG11 and TAC1 genes involved, respectively, in ergosterol synthesis and drug efflux [127].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selmecki, A., Gerami‐Nejad, M., Paulson, C., Forche, A., & Berman, J.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Berman, Judith
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-20
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
624-641
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2145329735
Cited by
325
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bowdoin - Digital Commons (Bowdoin College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI062427)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Candida albicans, fluconazole resistance, azole resistance, ERG11, TAC1, gene amplification, drug efflux pumps, transcription factors, gene copy number, aneuploidy, gene deletion
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Fungal Proteins, Gene Amplification, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Fluconazole, Chromosomes, Fungal, Open Reading Frames, Gene Deletion, Isochromosomes, Gene Dosage, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review