The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PopGenome: An Efficient Swiss Army Knife for Population Genomic Analyses in R
Open accessAbstract
Although many computer programs can perform population genetics calculations, they are typically limited in the analyses and data input formats they offer; few applications can process the large data sets produced by whole-genome resequencing projects. Furthermore, there is no coherent framework for the easy integration of new statistics into existing pipelines, hindering the development and application of new population genetics and genomics approaches. Here, we present PopGenome, a population genomics package for the R software environment (a de facto standard for statistical analyses). PopGenome can efficiently process genome-scale data as well as large sets of individual loci. It reads DNA alignments and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data sets in most common formats, including those used by the HapMap, 1000 human genomes, and 1001 Arabidopsis genomes projects. PopGenome also reads associated annotation files in GFF format, enabling users to easily define regions or classify SNPs based on their annotation; all analyses can also be applied to sliding windows. PopGenome offers a wide range of diverse population genetics analyses, including neutrality tests as well as statistics for population differentiation, linkage disequilibrium, and recombination. PopGenome is linked to Hudson's MS and Ewing's MSMS programs to assess statistical significance based on coalescent simulations. PopGenome's integration in R facilitates effortless and reproducible downstream analyses as well as the production of publication-quality graphics. Developers can easily incorporate new analyses methods into the PopGenome framework. PopGenome and R are freely available from CRAN (http://cran.r-project.org/) for all major operating systems under the GNU General Public License.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis
Excoffier, L., Laval, G., & Schneider, S. (2005) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.1177/117693430500100003 · Cited by 14,280
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 13,941
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases.
Nei, M., & Li, W. H. (1979) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269 · Cited by 10,402
Analysis of Gene Diversity in Subdivided Populations
Nei, M. (1973) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321 · Cited by 8,885
adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers
Jombart, T. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129 · Cited by 8,107
Fu, Y.-X. (1997) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/147.2.915 · Cited by 7,164
DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods
Rozas, J., Sánchez-DelBarrio, J. C., Messeguer, X., & Rozas, R. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359 · Cited by 6,131
Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.
Fu, Y. X., & Li, W. H. (1993) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/133.3.693 · Cited by 4,034
Cited by
Dsuite ‐ Fast D ‐statistics and related admixture evidence from VCF files
Malinsky, M., Matschiner, M., & Svardal, H. (2021) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13265 · Cited by 992
Domestication and Divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Beer Yeasts
Gallone, B., Steensels, J., Prahl, T., Soriaga, L., Saels, V., Herrera-Malaver, B., Merlevede, A., Roncoroni, M., Voordeckers, K., Miraglia, L., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.020 · Cited by 679
Chow, N. A., Muñoz, J. F., Gade, L., Berkow, E., Li, X., Welsh, R. M., Forsberg, K., Lockhart, S. R., Adam, R., Alanio, A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.01.06.896548 · Cited by 463
Regulation of genetic flux between bacteria by restriction–modification systems
Oliveira, P. H., Touchon, M., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1603257113 · Cited by 166
Population genomics and the evolution of virulence in the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans
Desjardins, C. A., Giamberardino, C., Sykes, S. M., Yu, C.-H., Tenor, J. L., Chen, Y., Yang, T., Jones, A. M., Sun, S., Haverkamp, M. R., et al. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.218727.116 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfeifer, B., Wittelsbürger, U., Ramos-Onsins, S. E., & Lercher, M. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-04-16
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1929-1936
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2124165778
- Cited by
- 939
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 23.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PopGenome: An Efficient Swiss Army Knife for Population Genomic Analyses in R. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msu136
- The paper
- Pfeifer, B., Wittelsbürger, U., Ramos-Onsins, S. E., & Lercher, M. J. (2014). PopGenome: An Efficient Swiss Army Knife for Population Genomic Analyses in R. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.