The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mutation Rate and Cancer
Open accessAbstract
The stability of the human genome requires that mutations in the germ line be exceptionally rare events. While most mutations are neutral or have deleterious effects, a limited number of mutations are required for adaptation to environmental changes. Drake has provided evidence that DNA-based microbes have evolved a mechanism to yield a common spontaneous mutation rate of ~0.003 mutations per genome per replication (Drake 1991). In contrast, mutation rates of RNA viruses are much larger (Holland et al. 1982) and can approach the maximum tolerable deleterious mutation rate of one per genome (Eigen and Schuster 1977; Eigen 1993). Drake calculates that lytic RNA viruses display spontaneous mutation rates of approximately one per genome while most have mutation rates that are approximately 0.1 per genome (Drake 1993). This constancy of germline mutation rates among microbial species need not necessarily mean constancy of the somatic mutation rates. Furthermore, there need not be a constant rate for somatic mutations during development. In this review, we consider mutations in cancer, a pathology in which there appears to be an increase in the rate of somatic mutations throughout the genome. Moreover, within the eukaryotic genome, as in microbes, there are “hot-spots” that exhibit unusually high mutation frequencies. It seems conceivable to us that many tumors contain thousands of changes in DNA sequence. The major question is: how do these mutations arise, and how many are rate-limiting for tumor progression?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nowell, P. C. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.959840 · Cited by 6,471
Bcl-2 heterodimerizes in vivo with a conserved homolog, Bax, that accelerates programed cell death
Oltval, Z. N., Milliman, C. L., & Korsmeyer, S. J. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90509-o · Cited by 6,003
A principle of natural self-organization: Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle
Eigen, M., & Schuster, P. (1977) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00450633 · Cited by 1,752
Kunkel, T. A. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r400006200 · Cited by 754
Cited by
High burden and pervasive positive selection of somatic mutations in normal human skin
Martincorena, I., Roshan, A., Gerstung, M., Ellis, P., Van Loo, P., McLaren, S., Wedge, D. C., Fullam, A., Alexandrov, L. B., Tubio, J. M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa6806 · Cited by 1,770
DePinho, R. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35041694 · Cited by 951
HER-2 gene amplification can be acquired as breast cancer progresses
Meng, S., Tripathy, D., Shete, S., Ashfaq, R., Haley, B., Perkins, S., Beitsch, P., Khan, A., Euhus, D., Osborne, C., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402993101 · Cited by 508
Mutational signatures and mutable motifs in cancer genomes
Rogozin, I. B., Pavlov, Y. I., Goncearenco, A., De, S., Lada, A. G., Poliakov, E., Panchenko, A. R., & Cooper, D. N. (2017) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx049 · Cited by 58
Zhang, S., Lloyd, R., Bowden, G., Glickman, B. W., & de Boer, J. G. (2002) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00297-4 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, A. L., & Loeb, L. A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1483-1490
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2126062698
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mutation Rate and Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/148.4.1483
- The paper
- Jackson, A. L., & Loeb, L. A. (1998). The Mutation Rate and Cancer. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/148.4.1483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.