The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Statistical Framework for Quantitative Trait Mapping
Abstract
We describe a general statistical framework for the genetic analysis of quantitative trait data in inbred line crosses. Our main result is based on the observation that, by conditioning on the unobserved QTL genotypes, the problem can be split into two statistically independent and manageable parts. The first part involves only the relationship between the QTL and the phenotype. The second part involves only the location of the QTL in the genome. We developed a simple Monte Carlo algorithm to implement Bayesian QTL analysis. This algorithm simulates multiple versions of complete genotype information on a genomewide grid of locations using information in the marker genotype data. Weights are assigned to the simulated genotypes to capture information in the phenotype data. The weighted complete genotypes are used to approximate quantities needed for statistical inference of QTL locations and effect sizes. One advantage of this approach is that only the weights are recomputed as the analyst considers different candidate models. This device allows the analyst to focus on modeling and model comparisons. The proposed framework can accommodate multiple interacting QTL, nonnormal and multivariate phenotypes, covariates, missing genotype data, and genotyping errors in any type of inbred line cross. A software tool implementing this procedure is available. We demonstrate our approach to QTL analysis using data from a mouse backcross population that is segregating multiple interacting QTL associated with salt-induced hypertension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Schafer, J. L. (1997) · doi:10.1201/9781439821862 · Cited by 6,012
Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.
Zeng, Z. B. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457 · Cited by 3,182
Haley, C. S., & Knott, S. A. (1992) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1992.131 · Cited by 1,991
Cited by
A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes
Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2088 · Cited by 2,609
Mammalian circadian biology: elucidating genome-wide levels of temporal organization
Lowrey, P. L., & Takahashi, J. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.175925 · Cited by 976
Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies?
Carlborg, Ö., & Haley, C. S. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1407 · Cited by 934
A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: what, how and which
O'Hara, R. B., & Sillanpää, M. J. (2009) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/09-ba403 · Cited by 771
Integrating Genetic and Network Analysis to Characterize Genes Related to Mouse Weight
Ghazalpour, A., Doss, S., Zhang, B., Wang, S., Plaisier, C., Castellanos, R., Brozell, A., Schadt, E. E., Drake, T. A., Lusis, A. J., et al. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020130 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Sen, Ś., & Churchill, G. A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 371-387
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2149945426
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 15.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Statistical Framework for Quantitative Trait Mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/159.1.371
- The paper
- Sen, Ś., & Churchill, G. A. (2001). A Statistical Framework for Quantitative Trait Mapping. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/159.1.371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.