The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Microsatellite Variability Screen for Positive Selection Associated With the “Out of Africa” Habitat Expansion of Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
We report a “hitchhiking mapping” study in D. melanogaster, which searches for genomic regions with reduced variability. The study's aim was to identify selective sweeps associated with the “out of Africa” habitat expansion. We scanned 103 microsatellites on chromosome 3 and 102 microsatellites on the X chromosome for reduced variability in non-African populations. When the chromosomes were analyzed separately, the number of loci with a significant reduction in variability only slightly exceeded the expectation under neutrality—six loci on the third chromosome and four loci on the X chromosome. However, non-African populations also have a more pronounced average loss in variability on the X chromosomes as compared to the third chromosome, which suggests the action of selection. Therefore, comparing the X chromosome to the autosome yields a higher number of significantly reduced loci. However, a more pronounced loss of variability on the X chromosome may be caused by demographic events rather than by natural selection. We therefore explored a range of demographic scenarios and found that some of these captured most, but not all aspects of our data. More theoretical work is needed to evaluate how demographic events might differentially affect X chromosomes and autosomes and to estimate the most likely scenario associated with the out of Africa expansion of D. melanogaster.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (1974) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300014634 · Cited by 3,415
Wiehe, T. (1998) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1006/tpbi.1997.1346 · Cited by 77
Cited by
Foll, M., & Gaggiotti, O. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.092221 · Cited by 2,736
Adaptation from standing genetic variation
BARRETT, R., & SCHLUTER, D. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.008 · Cited by 2,091
Stinchcombe, J. R., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2008) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 · Cited by 622
Bigham, A., Bauchet, M., Pinto, D., Mao, X., Akey, J. M., Mei, R., Scherer, S. W., Julian, C. G., Wilson, M. J., López Herráez, D., et al. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001116 · Cited by 597
A new approach for using genome scans to detect recent positive selection in the human genome
Tang, K., Thornton, K. R., & Stoneking, M. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050171 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Kauer, M. O., Dieringer, D., & Schlötterer, C.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1137-1148
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1889334151
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Microsatellite Variability Screen for Positive Selection Associated With the “Out of Africa” Habitat Expansion of Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/165.3.1137
- The paper
- Kauer, M. O., Dieringer, D., & Schlötterer, C. (2003). A Microsatellite Variability Screen for Positive Selection Associated With the “Out of Africa” Habitat Expansion of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/165.3.1137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.