Cited by 3,415Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene

Open access
Smith, John Maynard, Haigh, John·1974·Genetical Research

Abstract

Summary: When a selectively favourable gene substitution occurs in a population, changes in gene frequencies will occur at closely linked loci. In the case of a neutral polymorphism, average heterozygosity will be reduced to an extent which varies with distance from the substituted locus. The aggregate effect of substitution on neutral polymorphism is estimated; in populations of total size 10 6 or more (and perhaps of 10 4 or more), this effect will be more important than that of random fixation. This may explain why the extent of polymorphism in natural populations does not vary as much as one would expect from a consideration of the equilibrium between mutation and random fixation in populations of different sizes. For a selectively maintained polymorphism at a linked locus, this process will only be important in the long run if it leads to complete fixation. If the selective coefficients at the linked locus are small compared to those at the substituted locus, it is shown that the probability of complete fixation at the linked locus is approximately exp (− Nc ), where c is the recombinant fraction and N the population size. It follows that in a large population a selective substitution can occur in a cistron without eliminating a selectively maintained polymorphism in the same cistron.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0016672300014634

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neutral mutations linked to each compatible allele should spread through the population in a manner partly analogous to a selective sweep.

    “Neutral mutations linked to each compatible allele should also spread through the population in a manner partly analogous to a selective sweep (Maynard Smith and Haigh 1974).”

    From Finding Hybrid Incompatibilities Using Genome Sequences from Hybrid Populations (2021) · cites this paper as Maynard Smith and Haigh 1974

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says alleles linked to a favourable mutation tend to increase in frequency as that mutation becomes fixed; §2 applies this to neutral alleles. This supports the selective-sweep analogy, but the paper does not establish that each compatible allele will spread or carry linked neutral mutations with it. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The idea of genetic hitch-hiking originated with Maynard Smith and Haigh.

    “This idea originated with Maynard Smith and Haigh91, who called it genetic hitch-hiking.”

    From Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. (2008) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Introduction says the authors called the phenomenon the “hitch-hiking effect,” supporting the naming attribution. But it also identifies Kojima and Scheffer (1967) as having made a previous attack on the same problem, so the claim that the idea originated with Maynard Smith and Haigh is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. DICKEBSON, R. E. (1971). The structure of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 1, 26-45.
  2. HALDANE, J. B. S. (1957). The cost of natural selection. Journal of Genetics 55, 511-522.
  3. KIMXTRA, M. (1964). Diffusion models in population genetics. Journal of Applied Probability 1, 177-232.
  4. LEWONTIN, R. C. (1973). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. (In the Press.)
  5. SVED, J. A. (1968). Possible rates of gene substitution in evolution. American Naturalist 102, 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300014634 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Venue
Genetical Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
23-35
ISSN
  • 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5073
OpenAlex
W4251304755
Cited by
3,415
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 197 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 199 · 2020: 200 · 2019: 192 · 2018: 179 · 2017: 141 · 2016: 138 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 140 · 2013: 117 · 2012: 124
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Genetics Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
gene substitution, linked loci, neutral polymorphism, heterozygosity, mutation-selection balance, population size, cistron

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review