The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EFFECT OF A SELECTED LOCUS ON LINKED NEUTRAL LOCI
Abstract
The effects produced on linked neutral loci as a selected locus evolves towards its equilibrium value are considered. Significant effects on the neutral loci arise if the recombination fraction between the neutral and selected loci is smaller than the order of magnitude of the selective differences at the selected locus. The effect on gene frequencies at the neutral loci, that is, the hitchhiking effect, is determined, as well as the linkage disequilibrium generated by this hitchhiking effect. One of the more important findings is that significant disequilibrium can be generated between two neutral loci by the evolution of a linked selected locus. Consideration is given to the problem of determining how the effect of selection operating in natural populations can be detected, the question of the establishment of inversions in populations, and also to the nonequilibrium properties of populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations
Hill, W. G., & Robertson, A. (1968) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01245622 · Cited by 2,035
C. Genetics of Man Enzyme polymorphisms in man
Harris, H. (1966) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1966.0032 · Cited by 611
LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM AT STEADY STATE DETERMINED BY RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT AND RECURRENT MUTATION
Ohta, T., & Kimura, M. (1969) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/63.1.229 · Cited by 181
Linkage and selection: Two locus symmetric viability model
Karlin, S., & Feldman, M. W. (1970) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(70)90041-9 · Cited by 174
Jennings, H. S. (1917) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/2.2.97 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Hitchhiking Under Positive Darwinian Selection
Fay, J. C., & Wu, C.-I. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405 · Cited by 1,819
Associations Among Protein Heterozygosity, Growth Rate, and Developmental Homeostasis
Mitton, J. B., & Grant, M. C. (1984) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.15.1.479 · Cited by 721
RECOMBINATION AND THE MULTILOCUS STRUCTURE OF FUNGAL POPULATIONS
Milgroom, M. G. (1996) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.457 · Cited by 549
Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination
Charlesworth, B. (1990) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300025532 · Cited by 398
The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants
Charlesworth, B. (1994) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300032365 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomson, G.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1977-04-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 753-788
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1814098872
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EFFECT OF A SELECTED LOCUS ON LINKED NEUTRAL LOCI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/85.4.753
- The paper
- Thomson, G. (1977). THE EFFECT OF A SELECTED LOCUS ON LINKED NEUTRAL LOCI. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/85.4.753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
