Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 482

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disabilityin older women

·2000·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical disability and dependency are serious, and frequent, adverse health outcomes associated with aging and resulting from chronic disease. Reasoning has suggested that there might be a preclinical, intermediate phase of disablement which might develop in parallel with progression of underlying disease and precede and predict disability. Definition of this stage could provide a basis for screening and early intervention to prevent disability. The objective of this study was to determine preclinical functional predictors of incident mobility difficulty and provide evidence for a preclinical stage of disability. METHODS: A prospective, population-based cohort study was carried out in Baltimore, Maryland, with two evaluations 18 months apart. The participants were 436 community-dwelling women, 70-80 years of age at baseline, not cognitively impaired, and reporting difficulty in no areas, or only one area, of physical function (primarily mobility), who were participating in the Women's Health and Aging Study II. Participants were recruited from a population-based, age-stratified random sample. Incident mobility disability was studied in the subset without such disability at baseline. The main outcome measure was self-reported incident difficulty walking 1/2 mile or climbing up 10 steps. RESULTS: At baseline, 69.3% of the cohort reported no difficulty with mobility. After 18 months, 16.0 and 11.7% of this group reported incident difficulty walking 1/2 mile or climbing up 10 steps, respectively. Those reporting baseline task modification due to underlying health problems, our measure of preclinical disability, were at three- to fourfold higher odds of progressing to difficulty than were those without such modification. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, this self-report measure, task modification without difficulty, and objective measures of performance were independently and jointly predictive of incident mobility difficulty. Specifically, for incident difficulty walking 1/2 mile, self-reported task modification odds ratio (OR) = 3.67, walking speed (.5 m/s difference) OR = 2.16; for incident difficulty climbing up 10 stairs, OR for task modification = 3.84, for stair climb speed (1/3 step/s difference) = 2.08 (95% CI did not include 1 for any). Covariates, age, living alone, number of chronic diseases, depression score, knee strength, and balance by functional reach, were not significant predictors in either model. CONCLUSIONS: Two indicators of functional changes in older women without mobility difficulty, self-report of modification of method of doing a task in the absence of difficulty and performance measures, are independent and strong predictors of risk of incident mobility disability. The self-report measure provides substantial strength in predicting risk of incident disability across the full range of performance, and may identify a vulnerable point at which other risk factors act to cause transitions to disability. Together, the preclinical indicators identify a subset of high-functioning older women who are at high risk of mobility disability, and provide a potential basis for screening for disability risk and targeting interventions to prevent mobility disability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/55.1.m43

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 482

Metadata

Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
M43-M52
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2126487639
Cited by
482
References
0
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disabilityin older women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gerona/55.1.m43
The paper
Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disabilityin older women. (2000). The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/55.1.m43

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.