The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Change in Muscle Mass and Muscle Strength After a Hip Fracture: Relationship to Mobility Recovery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hip fracture in elderly persons has a serious impact on long-term physical function. This study determines the change in muscle strength and muscle mass after a hip fracture, and the associations between these changes and mobility recovery. METHODS: Ninety community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older who had recently experienced a fracture of the proximal femur were included in the study. At 2 to 10 days after hospital admission, the women's grip strength, ankle dorsiflexion strength, and regional muscle mass (by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) were measured, and the prefracture level of independence for five mobility function items was assessed. All measurements were repeated at 12 months. RESULTS: At follow-up, only 17.8% of the women had returned to their prefracture level of mobility function for all five items. Mobility function recovery was not related to change in skeletal muscle mass of the nonfractured leg or the arms. However, women who lost grip strength (mean loss of -28.7%, SD = 16.9%), or who lost ankle strength of the nonfractured leg (mean loss of -21.5%, SD = 14.7%), had a worse mobility recovery compared with those who gained strength (p = .04 and p = .09, respectively). In addition, chronic disease (p = .03), days hospitalized (p = .04), and self-reported hip pain (p = .07) were independent predictors of decline in mobility function. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that loss of muscle strength, but not loss of muscle mass, is an independent predictor of poorer mobility recovery 12 months after a hip fracture. When confirmed by other studies, these findings may have implications for rehabilitation strategies after a hip fracture.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, with advancing age, it becomes increasingly likely that even a brief, clinically mandated period of bed rest could initiate a serious decline in muscle strength and functional capacity, i.e., a “tipping point” from which some may not fully recover [4,7,8].”
From Protecting muscle mass and function in older adults during bed rest (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The resultant muscle loss, particularly in the ambulatory and postural muscles of the lower extremities, can have devastating consequences on muscle strength and function [8,20].”
From Protecting muscle mass and function in older adults during bed rest (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Karin, A., & Kristina, A. (1976) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(76)90695-7 · Cited by 5,508
Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people
Fiatarone, M. A., O'Neill, E. F., Ryan, N. D., Clements, K. M., Solares, G. R., Nelson, M. E., Roberts, S. B., Kehayias, J. J., Lipsitz, L. A., & Evans, W. J. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199406233302501 · Cited by 2,857
Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance
Rosenberg, I. H. (1997) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/127.5.990s · Cited by 2,399
Midlife Hand Grip Strength as a Predictor of Old Age Disability
Rantanen, T. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.558 · Cited by 1,505
Mazess, R., Barden, H. S., Bisek, J., & Hanson, J. (1990) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/51.6.1106 · Cited by 1,465
Magaziner, J. S., Simonsick, E. M., Kashner, T. M., Hebel, J. R., & Kenzora, J. E. (1990) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/45.3.m101 · Cited by 828
Self-citationAppendicular skeletal muscle mass: measurement by dual-photon absorptiometry
Heymsfield, S. B., Smith, R. C., Aulet, M., Bensen, B., Lichtman, S. W., Wang, J., & Pierson, R. (1990) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/52.2.214 · Cited by 819
Growth Hormone Replacement in Healthy Older Men Improves Body Composition but Not Functional Ability
Papadakis, M. A., Grady, D., Black, D., Tierney, M. J., Gooding, G. A. W., Schambelan, M., & Grunfeld, C. (1996) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-124-8-199604150-00002 · Cited by 474
Skelton, D. A., Young, A., Greig, C. A., & Malbut, K. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07004.x · Cited by 451
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 1990, Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 45, M101
- 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 348, 22
- 1996, 18, 19
- 1997, The Journal of Nutrition, 127, 998S
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Protecting muscle mass and function in older adults during bed rest
English, K. L., & Paddon-Jones, D. (2010) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e328333aa66 · Cited by 477
Clark, B. C., & Manini, T. M. (2012) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2011.12.002 · Cited by 455
Effects of Extended Outpatient Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture
Binder, E. F., Brown, M., Sinacore, D. R., Steger-May, K., Yarasheski, K. E., & Schechtman, K. B. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.7.837 · Cited by 380
Hip fractures among the elderly: causes, consequences and control
Marks, R., Allegrante, J. P., MacKenzie, C. R., & Lane, J. M. (2002) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s1568-1637(02)00045-4 · Cited by 296
Monaco, M. D., Vallero, F., Monaco, R. D., & Tappero, R. (2010) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2010.02.002 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Visser, M., Harris, T. B., Fox, K. M., Hawkes, W., Hebel, J. R., YuYahiro, J., Michael, R., Zimmerman, S. I., & Magaziner, J.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Visser, M.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- M434-M440
- ISSN
- 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-535X
- OpenAlex
- W2151941411
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R37 AG 09901, R37AG009901)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Keywords
- hip fracture, muscle strength, muscle mass, mobility recovery, grip strength, ankle dorsiflexion strength, older women, fracture rehabilitation, chronic disease, hip pain, length of hospital stay, physical function decline
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hip Fractures, Humans, Movement, Muscle, Skeletal, Recovery of Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review