Cited by 317Social Robot Interaction and HRIHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Is an Entertainment Robot Useful in the Care of Elderly People With Severe Dementia?

Tamura, T., Yonemitsu, S., Itoh, A., Oikawa, D., Kawakami, A., Higashi, Y., Fujimooto, T., Nakajima, K.·2004·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An entertainment robot was used as occupational therapy instead of animal-assisted therapy to avoid any danger or injury to the patient and maintain cleanliness. This study compared the effectiveness of a robot animal, AIBO, with a toy. METHOD: AIBO is made of metal and responds to spoken commands. We demonstrated AIBO to severely demented elderly people living in a geriatric home and observed their reactions. RESULTS: The most frequent reactions to AIBO consisted of looking at, communicating with, and caring for AIBO. The patients recognized that AIBO was a robot. However, once we dressed AIBO, the patients perceived AIBO as either a dog or a baby. Nevertheless, the presentation of AIBO resulted in positive outcomes for the severe dementia patients, including increased communication between the patients and AIBO. CONCLUSION: AIBO was clearly an effective rehabilitation tool in the treatment of severely demented patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/59.1.m83

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of 13 demented residents, subjects responded similarly to a plush mechanical toy dog and a robotic dog by talking to it or clapping when it moved.

    “Subjects responded to both objects, similarly, by talking to it or clapping their hands when it moved.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 1989, ARCH PSYCH NURS, 3, 191
  2. Hooker, 2002, Holistic nursing practice, 16, 17, 10.1097/00004650-200210000-00006 · DOI
  3. 2002, Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 57A, M428
  4. 2002, Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 57A, M422
  5. 2002, Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 57A, M419
  6. Brodie, 2002, Journal of clinical nursing, 11, 444, 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00628.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tamura, T., Yonemitsu, S., Itoh, A., Oikawa, D., Kawakami, A., Higashi, Y., Fujimooto, T., & Nakajima, K.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
M83-M85
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2134857549
Cited by
317
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
entertainment robots, AIBO, advanced dementia, older adults, animal-assisted therapy, occupational therapy, human-robot interaction, home-based elderly care
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Play Therapy, Robotics, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review