Cited by 96Frailty in Older AdultsSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Mortality in Relation to Frailty in Patients Admitted to a Specialized Geriatric Intensive Care Unit

Open access
Zeng, An, Song, Xiaowei, Dong, Jiahui, Mitnitski, Arnold, Liu, Jian, Guo, Zhenhui, Rockwood, Kenneth·2015·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In older adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), frailty influences prognosis. We examined the relationship between the frailty index (FI) based on deficit accumulation and early and late survival. METHODS: Older patients (≥65 years) admitted to a specialized geriatric ICU at the Liuhuaqiao Hospital, Guangzhou, China between July-December 2011 (n = 155; age 82.7±7.1 y; 87.1% men) were followed for 300 days. The FI was calculated as the proportion present of 52 health deficits. FI performance was compared with that of several prognostic scores. RESULTS: The 90-day death rate was 38.7% (n = 60; 27 died within 30 days). The FI score was correlated with the Glasgow Coma Scale, Karnofsky Scale, Palliative Performance Scale, Acute Physiology Score-APACHE II and APACHE IV (r (2) = 0.52 to 0.72, p < 0.001). Patients who died within 30 days had higher mean FI scores (0.41±0.11) than those who survived to 300 days (0.22±0.11; F = 38.91, p < 0.001). Each 1% increase in the FI from the previous level was associated with an 11% increase in the 30-day mortality risk (95% CI: 7%-15%) adjusting for age, sex, and the prognostic scores. The FI discriminated patients who died in 30 days from those who survived with moderately high accuracy (AUC = 0.89±0.03). No one with an FI score >0.46 survived past 90 days. CONCLUSION: ICU survival was strongly associated with the level of frailty at admission. An FI based on health deficit accumulation may help improve critical care outcome prediction in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glv084

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Rockwood K Guo Z Song X The frail older adult and the intensive care unit. Chin J Geriat. 2013; 32: 3– 8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, A., Song, X., Dong, J., Mitnitski, A., Liu, J., Guo, Z., & Rockwood, K.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Zhenhui
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
70
Issue
12
Pages
1586-1594
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2180667378
Cited by
96
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61300107, 59976016)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (S2012010010212)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CCI92216)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
frailty, frailty index, older adults, geriatric intensive care, mortality, 30-day mortality, health deficits, prognostic score, Apache, APACHE II score, APACHE IV, survival prediction, critical care outcomes
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Patient Admission, Prospective Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Frail Elderly, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review