Cited by 219Frailty in Older AdultsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The risk of adverse outcomes in hospitalized older patients in relation to a frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment

Evans, Stephen J., Sayers, Margaret, Mitnitski, Arnold, Rockwood, Kenneth·2014·Age and Ageing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: prognostication for frail older adults is complex, especially when they become seriously ill. OBJECTIVES: to test the measurement properties, especially the predictive validity, of a frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (FI-CGA) in an acute care setting in relation to the risk of death, length of stay and discharge destination. DESIGN AND SETTING: prospective cohort study. Inpatient medical units in a teaching, acute care hospital. SUBJECTS: individuals on inpatient medical units in a hospital, n = 752, aged 75+ years, were evaluated on their first hospital day; to test reliability, a subsample (n = 231) was seen again on Day 3. MEASUREMENTS: all frailty data collected routinely as part of a CGA were used to create the FI-CGA. Mortality data were reviewed from hospital records, claims data, Social Security Death Index and interviews with Discharge Managers. RESULTS: thirty-day mortality was 93 (12.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 10-15%) of whom 52 died in hospital. The risk of dying increased with each 0.01 increment in the FI-CGA: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.05, (95% CI = 1.04-1.07). People who were discharged home had the lowest admitting mean FI-CGA = 0.38 (±standard deviation 0.11) compared with those who died, FI-CGA = 0.51 (±0.12) or were discharged to nursing home, FI-CGA = 0.49 (±0.11). Likewise, increasing FI-CGA values on admission were significantly associated with a longer length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: frailty, measured by the FI-CGA, was independently associated with a higher risk of death and other adverse outcomes in older people admitted to an acute care hospital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/aft156

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, S. J., Sayers, M., Mitnitski, A., & Rockwood, K.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Rockwood, Kenneth
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2014-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
127-132
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2133979095
Cited by
219
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
frailty index, comprehensive geriatric assessment, frailty, older adults, hospitalized older adults, mortality, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, nursing home discharge, outcome prediction, predictive validity, acute care
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Decision Support Techniques, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Patient Discharge, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Geriatric Assessment, Frail Elderly, Hospital Mortality, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review