Cited by 151Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth and Well-being Studies

The Relationship of Social Environment, Social Networks, and Health Outcomes in The Seattle Longitudinal Study: Two Analytical Approaches

Bosworth, H. B., Schaie, K. W.·1997·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

This study examined the relation of social networks and perceived social environment to health outcomes and cost utilization over a 1-year period in a community sample of 387 (173 males, 214 females). Two analytical strategies, a variable-oriented approach and a subject-oriented approach, were used to complement each other: structural equation modeling assessed the direct relationship between social relationships and health, while cluster analysis examined how social relationship patterns were related to health outcomes. Lower levels of perceived social environment were associated with an increased number of hospital visits. For unmarried individuals, increased age was associated with greater medical usage and estimated total health care cost, while low perceived social environment was related to a greater number of doctor visits. Among married individuals, women had more frequent doctor visits, medication usage, estimated outpatient costs, and primary care visits. Married individuals with low levels of social networks had increased total health care costs, outpatient costs, and primary care visits. Cluster analysis was used to group individuals by characteristics of perceived social environment and social networks. Members of the cluster groups with greater health problems were more likely to be isolated, had the least social contact, and had lower levels of education and income. Including subject-oriented approaches is useful in complementing more popular regression methods…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/52b.5.p197

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosworth, H. B., & Schaie, K. W.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bosworth, H. B.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
52B
Issue
5
Pages
P197-P205
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2127308075
Cited by
151
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG008055)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH018904, 5 T32 MH191909-08, T32 MH18904-07)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
social networks, health outcomes, health care utilization, health care costs, marital status, social isolation, older adults, primary care visits, outpatient costs, medication use
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Health Status, Hospitalization, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Social Environment, Social Support, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review