Cited by 420Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Social Network Types Among Older Adults: A Multidimensional Approach

Fiori, K. L., Smith, J., Antonucci, T. C.·2007·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

Theories of social relations suggest that individuals' personal networks reflect multiple aspects of relationships, and that different constellations are more or less supportive of well-being. Using data from the Berlin Aging Study (N = 516; age, M = 85 years), we derived network types that reflect information about structure, function, and quality, and we examined their association with well-being. A cluster analysis revealed six network types: diverse-supported, family focused, friend focused-supported, friend focused-unsupported, restricted-nonfriends-unsatisfied, and restricted-nonfamily-unsupported. Well-being was predicted differentially by the six types. Although the oldest-old individuals (85 years of age or older) were overrepresented in the friend-focused-supported and restricted types, age did not moderate the association of types with well-being. A holistic consideration of structure, function, and quality of social networks in old age offers unique insights.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/62.6.p322

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Antonucci, T. C. (1986). Hierarchical mapping technique. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 10 (4), 10-12.
  2. Antonucci, T. C. (2001). Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support, and sense of control. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 427453). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  3. Smith, J., Borchelt, M., Maier, H., & Jopp, D. (2002). Health and wellbeing in the young old and oldest old. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 715-732.
  4. Stone, L., & Rosenthal, C. (1996). Profiles of the social networks of Canada's elderly: An analysis of 1990 General Social Survey data. In H. Litwin (Ed.), The social networks of older people: A cross-national analysis (pp. 77-97). Westport, CT: Praeger Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fiori, K. L., Smith, J., & Antonucci, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Fiori, K. L.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2007-11-01
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
P322-P330
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2144617542
Cited by
420
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social networks, older adults, network types, well-being, social support, family relationships, friendship, network structure, network quality, oldest old, Berlin Aging Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review