The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attention and Driving Performance in Alzheimer's Disease
Abstract
The present study examined the relationship between visual attention measures and driving performance in healthy older adults and individuals with very mild and mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Subjects were administered an on-road driving assessment and three visual attention tasks (visual search, visual monitoring, and useful field of view). The results indicated that error rate and reaction time during visual search were the best predictors of driving performance. Furthermore, visual search performance was predictive of driving performance above and beyond simple dementia severity and several traditional psychometric tests. The results suggest that general cognitive status may be useful for identifying individuals "at risk" for unsafe driving. However, measures of selective attention may serve to better differentiate safe versus unsafe drivers, especially in the DAT population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882
Self-citationMorris, J. C., McKeel, D. W., Storandt, M., Rubin, E. H., Price, J. L., Grant, E. A., Ball, M. J., & Berg, L. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.4.469 · Cited by 473 · cited 1×
“Both the reliability of the CDR and validation of the diagnosis with this research team have been excellent and welldocumented (Berg et al., 1990; Burke et al., 1988; Morris, McKeel, Fulling, Torack, & Berg, 1988; Morris et al., 1991).”
BackgroundSelf-citationValidation of clinical diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease
Morris, J. C., McKeel, D. W., Fulling, K., Torack, R. M., & Berg, L. (1988) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410240105 · Cited by 362
Self-citation
Cited by
Owsley, C., & McGwin, G. (2010) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.021 · Cited by 451
CLAY, O. J., WADLEY, V. G., EDWARDS, J. D., ROTH, D. L., ROENKER, D. L., & BALL, K. K. (2005) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000175009.08626.65 · Cited by 313
Self-citationOwsley, C., & McGwin, G. (1999) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00035-1 · Cited by 289
Reger, M. A., Welsh, R. K., Watson, G. S., Cholerton, B., Baker, L. D., & Craft, S. (2004) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.85 · Cited by 285
The useful field of view test: Normative data for older adults
EDWARDS, J., ROSS, L., WADLEY, V, CLAY, O., CROWE, M., ROENKER, D., & BALL, K. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.03.001 · Cited by 231
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Duchek, J. M., Hunt, L., Ball, K., Buckles, V., & Morris, J. C.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 53B
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- P130-P141
- ISSN
- 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5368
- OpenAlex
- W2126346838
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attention and Driving Performance in Alzheimer's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronb/53b.2.p130
- The paper
- Duchek, J. M., Hunt, L., Ball, K., Buckles, V., & Morris, J. C. (1998). Attention and Driving Performance in Alzheimer's Disease. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/53b.2.p130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
