CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 825Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relation Between Everyday Activities and Successful Aging: A 6-Year Longitudinal Study

Menec, V. H.·2003·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
DOI 10.1093/geronb/58.2.s74
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Activity has long been thought to be related to successful aging. This study was designed to examine longitudinally the relation between everyday activities and indicators of successful aging, namely well-being, function, and mortality. METHODS: The study was based on the Aging in Manitoba Study, with activity being measured in 1990 and function, well-being, and mortality assessed in 1996. Well-being was measured in terms of life satisfaction and happiness; function was defined in terms of a composite measure combining physical and cognitive function. RESULTS: Regression analyses indicated that greater overall activity level was related to greater happiness, better function, and reduced mortality. Different activities were related to different outcome measures; but generally, social and productive activities were positively related to happiness, function, and mortality, whereas more solitary activities (e.g., hand-work hobbies) were related only to happiness. DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the importance of activity in successful aging. The results also suggest that different types of activities may have different benefits. Whereas social and productive activities may afford physical benefits, as reflected in better function and greater longevity, more solitary activities, such as reading, may have more psychological benefits by providing a sense of engagement with life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/58.2.s74

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 1999, BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 319, 478
  2. 1991, 15, 49
  3. 1991, Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 46, S55
  4. KAHN, 1960, American Journal of Psychiatry, 117, 326, 10.1176/appi.ajp.117.4.326 · DOI
  5. 1990, Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 45, S39
  6. 1961, Journal of Gerontology, 15, 134
  7. 1989, Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 44, P72
  8. 1992, Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 47, S304

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–823 of 823

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Menec, V. H.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Menec, V. H.
ORCID
Menec, V. H.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
S74-S82
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
DOI
10.1093/geronb/58.2.s74
OpenAlex
W2096390659
Semantic Scholar
d0cbb603075bd1addf4903be060731f93ae28a45
Cited by
825
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 54
FWCI
16.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
successful aging, everyday activities, well-being, happiness, life satisfaction, physical function, cognitive function, mortality, social activity, productive activities, solitary activities, hobbies, reading, aging in place
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Happiness, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mortality, Regression Analysis, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review