Cited by 38Personality Traits and PsychologyAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Personality and Physical Functioning Among Older Adults: The Moderating Role of Education

Open access
Jaconelli, A., Stephan, Y., Canada, B., Chapman, B. P.·2013·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Drawing upon a vulnerability model, this study tested whether low educational level would amplify the negative contribution of risky personality traits, such as high neuroticism and low conscientiousness, on older adults physical functioning. METHOD: Five hundred and thirteen French-speaking community-dwelling older adults aged 60-91 years (mean age = 66.37, SD = 5.32) completed measures of physical functioning, education, personality traits, chronic conditions, and demographic variables. RESULTS: Results revealed that extraversion and conscientiousness were positively associated with physical functioning, whereas neuroticism was a negative predictor, beyond demographics, chronic conditions, and education. The negative relationship between neuroticism and physical functioning was stronger among individuals with low educational level and was nonsignificant among older people with higher level of education. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to support a vulnerability model, which entails an amplification of neuroticism risk at low education, but a diminishment of neuroticism risk for activity limitations at high education. As a whole, it appears that a focus on either personality or education without taking into account each other provides only a partial account of the predictors of basic daily physical activities in old age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbs094

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaconelli, A., Stephan, Y., Canada, B., & Chapman, B. P.
Affiliations
  • Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2012-10-15
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
553-557
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2106889565
Cited by
38
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K08AG031328)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
personality traits, physical function, older adults, education, neuroticism, conscientiousness, extraversion, vulnerability model, moderation, activity limitation, daily physical activity, chronic disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Educational Status, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review