Cited by 191Technology Use by Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Predictors of Older Adults' Technology Use and Its Relationship to Depressive Symptoms and Well-being

Open access
Elliot, A. J., Mooney, C. J., Douthit, K. Z., Lynch, M. F.·2014·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To extend the empirical evidence regarding the predictors of older adults' use of information and communications technology (ICT) and to further examine its relationship to depressive symptoms and well-being. METHOD: This cross-sectional study utilized a sample of community-dwelling older adults from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (N = 6,443). Structural equation modeling was used to estimate the effects of predictor variables on ICT use and the effects of use on depressive symptoms and well-being. Tests of moderation by demographic characteristics and level of ICT use were also performed. RESULTS: Socioeconomic status (SES), age, and cognitive function accounted for approximately 60% of the variance in ICT use. SES was a stronger predictor for Blacks/African Americans, whereas cognitive function was a stronger predictor for Whites. ICT use was unrelated to depressive symptoms or well-being. However, it acted as a moderator, such that limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) was a stronger predictor of depressive symptoms for high ICT users, whereas ill-health was a stronger predictor for non/limited users. DISCUSSION: Findings do not support the claim that ICT use directly enhances mental health or well-being among older adults although it may protect against depressive symptoms for individuals coping with health conditions other than ADL impairments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbt109

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliot, A. J., Mooney, C. J., Douthit, K. Z., & Lynch, M. F.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2013-12-04
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
667-677
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2118470409
Cited by
191
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
19.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • UR Research (University of Rochester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U01AG032947)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
older adults, ICT use, depressive symptoms, well-being, socioeconomic status, cognitive function, activities of daily living, racial differences, health problems, mental health
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Black or African American, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Forecasting, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Social Welfare, United States, Internet, Black People, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review