Cited by 230Technology Use by Older AdultsHealth disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and Disability

Escape loneliness by going digital: A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a Dutch experiment in using ECT to overcome loneliness among older adults

Open access
Fokkema, T., Knipscheer, K.·2007·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the outcomes of an Internet-at-home intervention experiment that intended to decrease loneliness among chronically ill and physically handicapped older adults through introducing them to the use of an electronic communication facility. METHOD: To determine the effectiveness of the experiment in terms of reducing loneliness, 15 older adults were interviewed three times: shortly before the start, two years later and immediately after termination of the experiment, while their loneliness scores at zero and post-measurement were compared with those of a control group. RESULTS: Both the participants and the control persons experienced a reduction in loneliness over time. However, the reduction was only significant for the intervention participants. Moreover, the changes in loneliness were significantly greater among the participants compared to the control persons. When looking more in detail, the effect of the experiment was only significant regarding emotional loneliness and among the highest educated. Findings of the qualitative research enabled us to understand the mechanisms through which the intervention helped alleviate loneliness. E-mail was found to facilitate social contact. Furthermore, the computer and Internet were often used to pass the time, taking people's minds off their loneliness. Unexpectedly, the intervention also improved people's self-confidence. CONCLUSION: The decline in loneliness is likely to be greater if persons under more favorable circumstances are selected and if more social functions of the Internet are used.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607860701366129

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technology-based community interventions, including telephone, Internet, and iPad/smartphone applications, have shown promising results in reducing social isolation among older adults.

    “There is a growing focus on technology-based community interventions, including those offered by telephone, Internet, and iPad/smartphone applications, with findings demonstrating promising results in reducing social isolation among older adults (43–45).”

    From Telephone-based group mental health support for older adults in central Canada: pilot acceptability and effectiveness findings of The CONNECT Program (2025) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Abstract (p. 3) reports a greater reduction in loneliness among participants in an Internet-at-home intervention than among controls, supporting the Internet portion of the claim. But the Results (p. 8) say the reduction in social loneliness was not significant, and the Discussion (p. 10) cautions that the observed reduction cannot be attributed to the intervention. This paper does not evaluate telephone or iPad/smartphone applications. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At three-year follow-up, in an internet training intervention for community-dwelling older people who lived alone and were housebound through chronic illness or physical disability, intervention group participants reported a significantly greater reduction in overall loneliness compared with the control group.

    “At the three-year follow-up, intervention group participants reported a significantly greater reduction in overall loneliness, in comparison with the control group”
  • In the same internet training intervention, no difference was observed between intervention and control on the sub-scales of social and emotional loneliness at three-year follow-up.

    “while no difference was observed on the sub-scales of social and emotional loneliness.”
  • Five out of 11 (45%) one-to-one interventions had a positive effect on at least one of the four social health sub-domains.

    “This compares with five out of 11 (45%) one-to-one interventions [59,71,78,79,81].”
  • One of the four (25%) interventions offering internet training led to beneficial effects.

    “as did one of the four (25%) interventions offering internet training [79].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. de Haan, J. (2004). ICT en samenleving [ECT and society]. In J. de Haan, & O. Klumper (Eds.), Jaarboek ICT en samenleving: Beleid in praktijk (pp. 225-264). Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  2. Linnemann, M. A. (1996). Een eenzaam (s)lot?: Een integratie van verklaringen van eenzaamheid onder ouderen boven de 75 jaar [Destined for loneliness: An integration of explanations of loneliness among the over-75s] PhD, Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
  3. van Baarsen, B. (2001). How's life? Adaptation to widowhood in later life and the consequences of partner death on the experienced emotional and social loneliness. PhD, Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fokkema, T., & Knipscheer, K.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Fokkema, T.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2007-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
496-504
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2121289794
Cited by
230
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • VSB Fonds
  • Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
loneliness, older adults, digital communication, email, social contact, emotional loneliness, chronic disease, physical disability, self-confidence, digital technology use
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Netherlands, Social Isolation, User-Computer Interface, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review