Cited by 28Mental Health Research TopicsTechnology Use by Older AdultsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Using a smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment protocol with community dwelling older African Americans

Open access
Fritz, Heather, Tarraf, Wassim, Saleh, Dan J., Cutchin, Malcolm P.·2017·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the feasibility of smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) approaches to collect psychosocial data from older populations, especially disadvantaged older populations. In response to this gap, this report provides evidence of the feasibility and utility of a smartphone-based EMA approach for real-time assessment with older African Americans. In addition, we share lessons learned about how to improve utility. METHODS: Ninety-seven older African Americans ages 55 and older (range: 55-95 years) used an Android smartphone loaded with an EMA application to provide data about their everyday activities and stress four times per day for seven consecutive days. RESULTS: Exit interviews early in the study suggested enhancements to the EMA interface. Adherence was demonstrated with response completion rates of 92-98% on EMA measures and no participant attrition based on the EMA protocol. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest using a smartphone-based EMA approach for data collection is feasible and has utility with older African Americans. We most likely enhanced adherence by testing, training, monitoring, and adapting the EMA protocol using input from older adults early in the EMA design process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbw166

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fritz, H., Tarraf, W., Saleh, D. J., & Cutchin, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2017-01-04
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
gbw166
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2570772566
Cited by
28
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wayne State University (ES020957, P30 ES020957)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES020957, ES020957)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, smartphone data collection, African American older adults, community-dwelling older adults, feasibility, psychosocial assessment, daily stress, participant attrition
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Residence Characteristics, Utilization Review, Geographic Information Systems, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review