Volunteering in the Community: Potential Benefits for Cognitive Aging
Abstract
Objectives This review aims to advance understanding of the potential benefits of volunteering in the community for older adults' cognitive functioning by taking an in-depth look at the relevant evidence to date. Method This review describes the main pathways through which volunteering could plausibly benefit cognitive functioning and critically examines research that has specifically investigated links between volunteering and cognition. Fifteen articles that assessed in adults aged ≥ 55 years the relationship between volunteering (predictor) and cognitive functioning (outcome) were identified via literature database searches. Results On balance, evidence from the small number of relevant studies to date supports the idea that volunteering can protect against cognitive aging with respect to global functioning and at least some specific cognitive domains. Studies that used robust designs and assessed domain-specific cognitive functioning produced the largest effect sizes. Discussion To help advance the field, this review puts forward recommendations for future research, with an emphasis on the need for robust study designs and specific investigations into the nature and extent of the cognitive benefits of volunteering. Through that work, researchers can determine how a simple and accessible activity like volunteering can best be used to help reduce the burden of age-related cognitive decline.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More recent studies report associations between volunteering and lower depression and loneliness, particularly among older adults, alongside stronger perceived purpose and social integration.
“More recent studies report associations with lower levels of depression and loneliness, particularly among older adults, alongside stronger perceived purpose and social integration (25, 26).”
From Volunteerism as a multidimensional form of human prosocial engagement (2026) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
The Impact of Age on Cognition
Murman, D. (2015) · Seminars in Hearing · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1555115 · Cited by 1,619 · see citing works
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Jenkinson, C. E., Dickens, A. P., Jones, K., Thompson-Coon, J., Taylor, R. S., Rogers, M., Bambra, C. L., Lang, I., & Richards, S. H. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-773 · Cited by 730 · see citing works
Bourassa, K. J., Memel, M., Woolverton, C., & Sbarra, D. A. (2017) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1081152 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Does social participation by the elderly reduce mortality and cognitive impairment?
Hsu, H. C. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860701366335 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
George, D. R., & Singer, M. E. (2011) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181f17f20 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Volunteerism as a multidimensional form of human prosocial engagement
Sarid, O. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1908108
- Authors
- Guiney, H., & Machado, L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology and Brain Health Research Centre, University of Otago and Brain Research New Zealand, Dunedin
- ORCID
- Guiney, Hayley
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-11-17
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 399-408
- ISSN
- 1079-5014
- 1758-5368
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Brain Research New Zealand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review