Cited by 34Memory Processes and InfluencesAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

Age-Related Facilitation in Recall Following Semantic Processing

Barrett, T. R., Wright, M.·1981·Journal of Gerontology

Abstract

The present experiment was an attempt to reduce or eliminate the age-related deficit in recall following a semantic processing task. It was hypothesized that variables that might affect depth or elaborateness of semantic processing would consequently affect the size and direction of recall differences between younger and older adults. Specifically, we tested for the effects of differential word familiarity and one vs two semantic tasks on recall in young and older adults following semantic processing. The results demonstrated that word familiarity and number of processing tasks both had a strong effect on recall. Older adults benefited as much from additional semantic processing as younger adults. Additionally, older adults actually showed higher recall than younger adults when subjects processed words more familiar to older adults. These results demonstrate that, given appropriate conditions, older adults may actually show higher performance in a memory task than younger adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronj/36.2.194

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manipulations aimed at enforcing semantic encoding lead to more encoding than simple instructions to attend.

    “Manipulations aimed at enforcing semantic encoding (eg, make up a story with these words) lead to more encoding than simple instructions to attend. 44”

    From Domains of cognition and their assessment (2019) · cites this paper as [44]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, T. R., & Wright, M.
Venue
Journal of Gerontology
Published
1981-03-01
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
194-199
ISSN
0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995536054
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
age-related memory decline, semantic processing, memory retrieval, word familiarity, older adults, elaborative processing, semantic tasks
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Mental Recall, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review