The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age Differences in Divided Attention in a Simulated Driving Task
Abstract
The ability of young, middle-aged, and old adults to divide attention was examined using a dual task experiment involving two continuous performance tasks. The first task was a compensatory tracking task modeled after the important everyday activity of car driving. The second task was a self-paced visual choice-reaction time task requiring analysis of a small visual display presented in such a way that no eye movements were required when the two tasks had to be performed simultaneously. Single-task difficulty was individually adjusted for each subject. Performance-Operating-Characteristics were used to control for individual differences in attention allocation strategies. Even when individual differences in single task performance were adequately controlled for, elderly adults showed a significantly decreased ability to divide attention when compared with young and middle-aged adults. Young and middle-aged adults did not differ in the ability to divide attention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis.
Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.443 · Cited by 496
Training for attentional control in dual task settings: a comparison of young and old adults.
Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.1.1.50 · Cited by 413
REED, M. P., & GREEN, P. A. (1999) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/001401399185117 · Cited by 353
Reger, M. A., Welsh, R. K., Watson, G. S., Cholerton, B., Baker, L. D., & Craft, S. (2004) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.85 · Cited by 285
Caird, J. K., Edwards, C. J., Creaser, J. I., & Horrey, W. J. (2005) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/0018720054679542 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Ponds, R. W. H. M., Brouwer, W. H., & Van Wolffelaar, P. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Gerontology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-11-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- P151-P156
- ISSN
- 0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095550455
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age Differences in Divided Attention in a Simulated Driving Task. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronj/43.6.p151
- The paper
- Ponds, R. W. H. M., Brouwer, W. H., & Van Wolffelaar, P. C. (1988). Age Differences in Divided Attention in a Simulated Driving Task. Journal of Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/43.6.p151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.