The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task
Abstract
Driving performance in an instrumented vehicle was compared with performance in a low-cost, fixed-based driving simulator. Six men and six women drove a freeway route while periodically dialling simulated phone calls. The same subjects drove a laboratory driving simulator using two visual fidelity levels: a colour scene with relatively high detail, and a monochrome (night) scene showing only road-edge markings. Lane position, speed, steering-wheel angle and throttle position were recorded in both contexts. Lane-keeping in the simulator was less precise than on the road, but speed control performance was comparable. The SD of lane position in normal driving was about twice as large, on average, in the simulator (0.360 versus 0.165 m). Lane keeping and speed control were less precise when dialling the phone than in normal driving, both in the simulator and on the road, but the performance decrement was greater in the simulator. The addition of the phone task increased the mean lateral speed in the car by about 43%, while in the simulator the mean lateral speed increased by 158% with the addition of the phone task. Subjects >60 years of age showed larger performance decrements during a concurrent phone dialling task than did subjects 20–30 years of age both in the simulator and on-road. No important differences in driving performance were found between the high and low simulator scene fidelity levels. The simulator demonstrated good absolute validity for measures of speed control and good relative validity for the effects of the phone task and age on driving precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting
Kluge, A., Badura, B., Urbas, L., & Burkolter, D. (2010) · Cited by 1,125
Driving Experience and Task Demands in Simulator and Instrumented Car: A Validation Study
Blaauw, G. J. (1982) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088202400408 · Cited by 339
Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones— A simulator study
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1994) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/0001-4575(94)90035-3 · Cited by 267
THE ATTENTIONAL DEMAND OF AUTOMOBILE DRIVING
Senders, J. W., Kristofferson, A. B., Levison, W. H., Dietrich, C. W., & Ward, J. L. (1967) · Highway Research Record · Cited by 256
The Development of a Time-Related Measure to Describe Driving Strategy
Godthelp, H., Milgram, P., & Blaauw, G. J. (1984) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088402600302 · Cited by 239
Age Differences in Divided Attention in a Simulated Driving Task
Ponds, R. W. H. M., Brouwer, W. H., & Van Wolffelaar, P. C. (1988) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/43.6.p151 · Cited by 167
Sleepiness and Ethanol Effects on Simulated Driving
Roehrs, T., Beare, D., Zorick, F. J., & Roth, T. G. (1994) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00896.x · Cited by 150
The Influence of Motion and Audio Cues on Driver Performance in an Automobile Simulator
Mclane, R. C., & Wierwille, W. W. (1975) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872087501700508 · Cited by 112
A simulator study of the safety implications of cellular mobile phone use
Stein, A. C., Parseghian, Z., & Allen, R. W. (1987) · Cited by 50
Driver workload as a function of road geometry: a pilot experiment
Green, P., Lin, B., & Bagian, T. M. (1994) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Cited by
Konstantopoulos, P., Chapman, P., & Crundall, D. (2010) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.022 · Cited by 451
Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance
Rakauskas, M. E., Gugerty, L. J., & Ward, N. J. (2004) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2004.06.003 · Cited by 357
Cell Phones and Driving: Review of Research
Mccartt, A. T., Hellinga, L. A., & Bratiman, K. A. (2006) · Traffic Injury Prevention · doi:10.1080/15389580600651103 · Cited by 305
Shechtman, O., Classen, S., Awadzi, K., & Mann, W. (2009) · Traffic Injury Prevention · doi:10.1080/15389580902894989 · Cited by 255
Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research
Monk, C. A., Boehm-Davis, D. A., Mason, G., & Trafton, J. G. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.4.650.56816 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- REED, M. P., & GREEN, P. A.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1015-1037
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2113168155
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/001401399185117
- The paper
- REED, M. P., & GREEN, P. A. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
