The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring the Activities of Daily Living: Comparisons Across National Surveys
Abstract
The "activities of daily living," or ADLs, are the basic tasks of everyday life, such as eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, and transferring. Reported estimates of the size of the elderly population with ADL disabilities differ substantially across national surveys. Differences in which ADL items are being measured and in what constitutes a disability account for much of the variation. Other likely explanations are differences in sample design, sample size, survey methodology, and age structure of the population to which the sample refers. When essentially equivalent ADL measures are compared, estimates for the community-based population vary by up to 3.1 percentage points; and for the institutionalized population, with the exception of toileting, by no more than 3.2 percentage points. As small as these differences are in absolute terms, they can be large in percent differences across surveys. For example, the National Medical Expenditure Survey estimates that there are 60 percent more elderly people with ADL problems than does the Supplement on Aging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neighborhood Effects on the Long-Term Well-Being of Low-Income Adults
Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1224648 · Cited by 747
Resolving inconsistencies in trends in old-age disability: Report from a technical working group
Freedman, V. A., Crimmins, E., Schoeni, R. F., Spillman, B. C., Aykan, H., Kramarow, E., Land, K., Lubitz, J., Manton, K., Martin, L. G., et al. (2004) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2004.0022 · Cited by 261
Affective state estimation for human–robot Interaction
Kulic, D., & Croft, E. A. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2007.904899 · Cited by 230
Disability trends among elderly persons and implications for the future
Waidmann, T. A., & Liu, K. (2000) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/55.5.s298 · Cited by 212
Disability and cognitive impairment in the elderly
Barberger-Gateau, P., & Fabrigoule, C. (1997) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638289709166525 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiener, J. M., Hanley, R. J., Clark, R., & Van Nostrand, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Gerontology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-11-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- S229-S237
- ISSN
- 0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2333655813
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Activities of Daily Living: Comparisons Across National Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronj/45.6.s229
- The paper
- Wiener, J. M., Hanley, R. J., Clark, R., & Van Nostrand, J. F. (1990). Measuring the Activities of Daily Living: Comparisons Across National Surveys. Journal of Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.6.s229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.