Cited by 182Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Everyday Cognitive Competence in Elderly Persons: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Findings

Willis, S. L.·1996·The Gerontologist

Abstract

This article focuses on everyday cognitive competence as a critical aspect of functional health. Everyday cognitive competence is defined as the ability to perform adequately those cognitively complex tasks considered essential for living on one's own in this society. A major challenge for those involved in assessment and judgment of competence is to define the critical domains of functional abilities associated with living independently. Prior research on the instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) may be particularly useful. Findings from our research on a measure assessing everyday cognitive competence within each of the IADL domains are presented. Elderly persons' performance on the measure of everyday cognition relate to behavioral observations of those subjects performing similar activities in their home and to self and spousal IADL ratings. Seven-year longitudinal data indicate that there is relatively modest decline in performance on cognitively complex everyday tasks during the 60s, but that steeper patterns of normative decline are found in the late 70s and 80s.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/36.5.595

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding everyday cognitive competence provides information about the needs of older adults that might be well-supported by technology.

    “Understanding everyday cognitive competence (e.g., Willis, 1996 ) provides information about the needs of older adults that might be well-supported by technology.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willis, S. L.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Willis, S. L.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
1996-10-01
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
595-601
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2126444078
Cited by
182
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag008082-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-08082)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
older adults, instrumental activities of daily living, functional independence, cognitive decline, behavioral observation, cognitive assessment
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Problem Solving, Geriatric Assessment, Mental Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review