Cited by 457Aging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology Research

Social engagement and disability in a community population of older adults: the New Haven EPESE

Open access
Mendes de Leon, C. F.·2003·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of social engagement on disability among community-dwelling older adults in 1982-1991. Data were collected from the New Haven, Connecticut, site of the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. Baseline social engagement was measured by using 11 items related to social and productive activity. Disability data consisted of a six-item measure of activities of daily living, a three-item measure of gross mobility, and a four-item measure of basic physical functions. Nine waves of yearly disability data were analyzed by using generalized estimating equations models. After adjustment for age, gender, race, and physical activity, significant cross-sectional associations (p's < 0.001) were found between social engagement and all three measures of disability, with more socially engaged older adults reporting less disability. Social engagement also showed small, but negative interaction effects with follow-up-time outcomes (p's < 0.01), indicating that the protective effect of social engagement decreased slightly during follow-up. Results suggest a strong, but not necessarily causal association of social engagement with disability. Promotion of social engagement may still be important for the prevention of disability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwg028

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being unable to complete daily tasks may indicate limitations in physical ability and mobility, which may influence ability to be socially engaged, and hence increase level of social isolation.

    “Being unable to complete such tasks may indicate limitations in physical ability and mobility, which may influence ability to be socially engaged, and hence increase level of social isolation [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendes de Leon, C. F.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
157
Issue
7
Pages
633-642
ISSN
0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132692918
Cited by
457
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 25
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Epidemiology (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ag012102-011, 7r01ag011042-03, 7r29ag010170-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (R29 AG-10170, R01-AG-11042, N01‐AG12102)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
social engagement, disability, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, activities of daily living, physical function, social activity, disability prevention
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Connecticut, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Income, Male, Social Class, Social Environment, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review