Cited by 92Aging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and Disability

Meeting the need to belong: Predicting effects of a friendship enrichment program for older women

Open access
Stevens, Nan L., Martina, Camille M. S., Westerhof, Gerben J.·2006·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study explores the effects of participation in a program designed to enrich friendship and reduce loneliness among women in later life. Several hypotheses based on the need to belong, socioemotional selectivity theory, and the social compensation model were tested. DESIGN AND METHODS: Study 1 involved two measurement points, one at the end of the program and the other 1-year later. Study 2 used a pretest-post-test control group design with a follow-up measurement. A combination of semistructured interviews and structured questionnaires was used to collect data. A comparison group was also drawn from a nationwide representative sample. RESULTS: Participants were characterized by deprivation on the need to belong; that is, loss of a partner, higher levels of loneliness and negative affect, and lower positive affect compared with a nationwide representative sample of same-aged women. Participants were more likely than women in a control group to report the development of new friendships and an improvement in friendship. The combination of new and improved friendships contributed to a significant reduction in loneliness within a year. There was no evidence of satiation of the need to belong among those who did not expand or improve friendships. Loss of a partner had no influence on friendship development; however, age did. Older participants were less likely to improve friendships. IMPLICATIONS: The action-oriented approach that focused on friendship development in this intervention might be applied to other goals considered important in later life (optimal health, autonomy, harmonious family relations).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/46.4.495

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research indicates that indices of social connectedness are modifiable among older adults using social interventions, including group psychotherapy, art/recreational therapy, and peer support.

    “Research indicates that indices of social connectedness are modifiable among older adults using social interventions, including group psychotherapy [83], art/recreational therapy [84,85,86,87], and peer support [88].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ferraro, K. F., & Farmer, M. M. (1995). Social compensation in adulthood and later life. In R. A. Dixon & L. Backman (Eds.), Compensating for psychological deficits and declines: Managing losses and promoting gain (pp. 127-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. In V. J. Derlega & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social inter- action (pp. 246-276). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevens, N. L., Martina, C. M. S., & Westerhof, G. J.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Stevens, Nan L.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2006-08
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
495-502
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2135073386
Cited by
92
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
need to belong, loneliness, older women, socioemotional selectivity theory, loss of a partner, friendship development, positive affect, negative affect, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Quality of Life, Women, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review