Cited by 24Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and research

Time Effects of Informal Caregiving on Cognitive Function and Well-Being: Evidence From ELSA

Yuan, Jing, Grühn, Daniel·2021·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Background and objectives As informal caregiving becomes prevalent, its consequences for caregivers' cognitive and socioemotional functioning gain more importance for society. There are inconsistent findings regarding the direction of the impact of caregiving-whether caregiving maintains or compromises functioning-and the impact of time-whether the effects accumulate or are stable. In this study, we elucidated 3 time effects of caregiving-concurrent, cumulative, and lagged effects-on cognitive and socioemotional functioning. Research design and methods We used data from Wave 1 (2002-2003) to Wave 8 (2016-2017) in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and latent growth curve models with the time-varying predictor to investigate 3 time effects of caregiving on cognitive function (memory and executive function) and well-being (life satisfaction and quality of life). Results Over and beyond age effects, current caregiving (concurrent effect) was related to worse well-being and better delayed recall. Little robust cumulative effect was found on cognition and well-being. In addition, there were significant and differential lagged effects of caregiving after controlling for concurrent and cumulative effects; that is, caregiving was related to worse well-being and better memory functioning 2-4 years later. Discussion and implications The differential concurrent and lagged effects of caregiving on cognitive and socioemotional functioning suggest separate mechanisms for diffe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnaa114

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, J., & Grühn, D.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Jing
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2020-08-25
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
341-351
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W3080098987
Cited by
24
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
informal care, caregiver well-being, lagged effects, cumulative effects, memory, executive function, life satisfaction, quality of life, delayed recall, English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, older adults
MeSH terms
Aging, Cognition, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Quality of Life, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review