Cited by 166Gender, Health, and Social InequalityAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Gender Relations and Applied Research on Aging

Calasanti, T.·2010·The Gerontologist

Abstract

As a concept in gerontology, gender appears as lists of traits learned through socialization when theorized at all. I argue for a framework that theorizes the intersections of relations of gender inequality with those of age. This framework holds that men and women gain resources and bear responsibilities, in relation to one another, by virtue of mundane categorization into naturalized stratified groups. Current research shows that this approach allows explanation of gender differences, which appear in many reports but which usually go untheorized, as responses to social inequality. I illustrate applications to research and practice in relation to three areas of old age experiences: financial security, spousal care work, and health. Throughout, I discuss implications of focusing on inequality to enhance our abilities to engage in effective research, practice, and policy for older people, women and men alike. For instance, an understanding of the gender division of labor and workplace discrimination makes clear that financial status in later life cannot be reduced to individual choices concerning paid labor or retirement planning. And understanding that people orient their behaviors to gender ideals allows us to see that men and women perform spousal care in similar and different ways that require varied responses from practitioners; it also reveals contexts in which men engage in positive health behaviors. Finally, I argue that gerontologists interested in facilitating favorable outcomes for old people should consider research and practice that would disrupt, not reinforce, the bases of gender inequalities in later life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnq085

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The discipline's treatment of age may stem from a naturalistic view of age (and aging) as biological and, therefore, presocial or even nonsocial.

    “The discipline's treatment of age also may stem from a naturalistic view of age (and aging) as biological and, therefore, presocial or even nonsocial (e.g., Calasanti 2010, Pickard 2014, Twigg 2013).”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calasanti, T.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Calasanti, T.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2010-10-18
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
720-734
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2124357531
Cited by
166
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
gender inequality, intersectionality, age and gender, gender division of labor, employment discrimination, gender ideals, older women, social stratification
MeSH terms
Aging, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Socioeconomic Factors, Women, Women's Rights, Caregivers, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review