Gender Relations and Applied Research on Aging
Abstract
As a concept in gerontology, gender appears as lists of traits learned through socialization when theorized at all. I argue for a framework that theorizes the intersections of relations of gender inequality with those of age. This framework holds that men and women gain resources and bear responsibilities, in relation to one another, by virtue of mundane categorization into naturalized stratified groups. Current research shows that this approach allows explanation of gender differences, which appear in many reports but which usually go untheorized, as responses to social inequality. I illustrate applications to research and practice in relation to three areas of old age experiences: financial security, spousal care work, and health. Throughout, I discuss implications of focusing on inequality to enhance our abilities to engage in effective research, practice, and policy for older people, women and men alike. For instance, an understanding of the gender division of labor and workplace discrimination makes clear that financial status in later life cannot be reduced to individual choices concerning paid labor or retirement planning. And understanding that people orient their behaviors to gender ideals allows us to see that men and women perform spousal care in similar and different ways that require varied responses from practitioners; it also reveals contexts in which men engage in positive health behaviors. Finally, I argue that gerontologists interested in facilitating favorable outcomes for old people should consider research and practice that would disrupt, not reinforce, the bases of gender inequalities in later life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The discipline's treatment of age may stem from a naturalistic view of age (and aging) as biological and, therefore, presocial or even nonsocial.
“The discipline's treatment of age also may stem from a naturalistic view of age (and aging) as biological and, therefore, presocial or even nonsocial (e.g., Calasanti 2010, Pickard 2014, Twigg 2013).”
From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti 2010
Cites
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Whether collected en masse and analyzed in quantitative form, as by McCall (2005) and Herd (2005, 2006), or in small groups in qualitative fashion (e.g., Calasanti, 2006; Solimeo, 2008b), analysis of any such data, informed by theories of the ways in which people manage behavior with ideals of…”
BackgroundConstructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Courtenay, W. H. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1 · Cited by 4,091 · see citing works
O’Brien, R., Hunt, K., & Hart, G. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.008 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Real men, real husbands: Caregiving and masculinities in later life
Ribeiro, O., Paúl, C., & Nogueira, C. (2007) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2007.05.005 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dolbin-MacNab, M. L., & Yancura, L. A. (2018) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.1177/0091415016689565 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Caregiving Burden Among Caregivers of People With Dementia Through the Lens of Intersectionality
Liu, R., Chi, I., & Wu, S. (2022) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnab146 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework
Barrett, A. E. (2022) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-083121-043741 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Couples' shared beliefs about aging and implications for future functional limitations
Mejía, S. T., & Gonzalez, R. (2017) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnx071 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Calasanti, T.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Calasanti, T.
- ORCID
- Calasanti, T.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-10-18
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 720-734
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2124357531
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- gender inequality, intersectionality, age and gender, gender division of labor, employment discrimination, gender ideals, older women, social stratification
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Socioeconomic Factors, Women, Women's Rights, Caregivers, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review