Cited by 125Education and Military IntegrationRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentAging and Gerontology Research

Long-term Outcomes of Military Service in Aging and the Life Course: A Positive Re-envisioning

Open access
Spiro, Avron, Settersten, Richard A., Aldwin, Carolyn M.·2016·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Most research on military service focuses on its short-term negative consequences, especially the mental and physical injuries of those deployed in warzones. However, studies of long-term outcomes reveal surprisingly positive effects of military service—both those early in adulthood that grow over time and others that can emerge later in life. These multidomain effects have been found in veterans of World War II and the Korean War and are now being seen in veterans of the Vietnam War. Although some are directly attributable to public policies such as the GI Bill, which facilitate educational and economic gains, there are personal developmental gains as well, including autonomy, emotional maturity and resilience, mastery, and leadership skills, that lead to better health and well-being in later life. These long-term effects vary across persons, change over time within persons, and often reflect processes of cumulative advantage and disadvantage. We propose a life-span model of the effects of military service that provides a perspective for probing both long-term positive and negative outcomes for aging veterans. We further explicate the model by focusing on both sociocultural dynamics and individual processes. We identify public-use data that can be examined to evaluate this model, and offer a set of questions that can be used to assess military service. Finally, we outline an agenda for dedicated inquiry into such effects and consider policy implications for the health and well-being of aging veterans in later life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnv093

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiro, A., Settersten, R. A., & Aldwin, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2015-12-09
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
5-13
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2255424595
Cited by
125
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R24AG039343)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
military service, veterans, aging, life course, long-term outcomes, GI Bill, resilience, mastery, leadership skills, well-being, World War II veterans, Korean War veterans, Vietnam War veterans
MeSH terms
Aging, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Military Personnel, Time Factors, United States, Veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review