Cited by 49Education and Military IntegrationMilitary and Defense StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Military-to-civilian transition theories and frameworks

Pedlar, David, Thompson, James M., Andrew Castro, Carl·2019·Military Veteran Reintegration

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-815312-3.00003-6

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pedlar, D., Thompson, J. M., & Andrew Castro, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Military Veteran Reintegration
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2019
Pages
21-50
OpenAlex
W2970635776
Cited by
49
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
18.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military and Defense Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
military-to-civilian transition, transition theory, well-being, life course trajectories, identity disruption, civilian employment, social support, housing, rehabilitation, health care access, military personnel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review