Cited by 353Technology Use by Older AdultsICT Impact and PoliciesICT in Developing Communities

Exploring Privilege in the Digital Divide: Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice

Open access
Fang, Mei Lan, Canham, Sarah L, Battersby, Lupin, Sixsmith, Judith, Wada, Mineko, Sixsmith, Andrew·2019·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The digital revolution has resulted in innovative solutions and technologies that can support the well-being, independence, and health of seniors. Yet, the notion of the “digital divide” presents significant inequities in terms of who accesses and benefits from the digital landscape. To better understand the social and structural inequities of the digital divide, a realist synthesis was conducted to inform theoretical understandings of information and communication technologies (ICTs); to understand the practicalities of access and use inequities; to uncover practices that facilitate digital literacy and participation; and to recommend policies to mitigate the digital divide. Research Design and Methods: A systematic search yielded 55 articles published between 2006 and 2016. Synthesis of existing knowledge, combined with user-experience elicited through a deliberative dialogue session with community stakeholders (n = 35), made visible a pattern of privilege that determined individual agency in ICT access and use. Results: Though age is consistently centralized as the key determinant of the digital divide, our analyses, which encompassed both van Dijk’s resources and appropriation theory and intersectionality, appraised this notion and revealed that age is not the sole determinant. Findings highlight the role of other factors that contribute to digital inequity among community-dwelling middle-aged (45–64) and older (65+) adults, including education, income, gender, and generational status. Discussion and Implications: Informed by results of a realist synthesis that was guided by intersectional perspectives, a conceptual framework was developed outlining implications for theory, policy, and practice to address the wicked problem that is the digital divide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gny037

Cites

75 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having a device does not mean older adults know how to use it or feel comfortable with it.

    “The majority of older adults do own a device and go online; unfortunately, device ownership does not translate to knowledge and comfort with devices.3”

    From Promoting Technology and Virtual Visits to Improve Older Adult Mental Health in the Face of COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

    The “Broadening knowledge” section describes lack of skills and familiarity and says ICT use can feel daunting to middle-aged and older adults, supporting the point that access to a device does not ensure knowledge or comfort. The cited sentence also says a majority of older adults own a device and go online; our copy does not establish that majority claim. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most older adults possess a device and use the internet.

    “The majority of older adults do own a device and go online; unfortunately, device ownership does not translate to knowledge and comfort with devices.3”

    From Promoting Technology and Virtual Visits to Improve Older Adult Mental Health in the Face of COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Age section says older adults are less likely to use the Internet and gives regular-use rates below 50% for several groups over 70. It does not establish whether a majority of older adults overall own a device or go online. Searches for majority Internet use and device ownership found no passage establishing those claims; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cutler, N. E. (2015). Will the Internet help your parents to live longer? Isolation, longevity, health, death, and Skype. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 69(2), 21-26.
  2. Golant, S. (2015). Aging in the right place. Towson: Health Professions Press.
  3. Hankivsky, O. (2014). Intersectionality 101. Cal, 64(1), 238.
  4. Hankivsky, O., Cormier, R., & De Merich, D. (2009). Intersectionality: Moving women's health research and policy forward (pp. 68). Vancouver, Canada: Women's Health Research Network.
  5. Wong, G., Westhorp, G., Pawson, R., & Greenhalgh, T. (2013). Realist synthesis: RAMESES training materials. University of Oxford, UK: RAMESES Project.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, M. L., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Wada, M., & Sixsmith, A.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Gerontology Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Heriot-Watt University (GB)
Corresponding author
Fang, Mei Lan
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2018-05-10
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
e1-e15
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2802606063
Cited by
353
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (421-2015-2014)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
digital divide, older adults, digital literacy, information and communication technologies, intersectionality, ageism, social inequities, digital inclusion policy, community-dwelling adults, middle-aged adults, income and education disparities, gender disparities, generational status
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Middle Aged, Public Policy, Internet, Independent Living, Digital Divide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review