The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design
Open accessAbstract
Background and Objectives: There is a lack of understanding of how older adults’ involvement and participation matters in actual design practice. This systematic literature review investigates existing empirical studies involving older users during the design of technologies and explores the nature and consequences of involving older people. Research Design and Methods: Our literature review is informed by the guidelines of the PRISMA statement. We examined the included studies by means of thematic content analysis to identify the nature of older users’ involvement and existing evidence on what consequences it has. Results: In total, 40 empirical studies published in the period 2014–2018 are included in the review. Most empirical studies involve older people from local networks, with underlying stereotypical images and at lower levels of participation. The results reveal three main consequences of involving older users: learning, adjusted design, and an increased sense of participation. Furthermore, we found that user involvement is a structured process whose outcomes are contingent on a range of premises. Discussion and Implications: Synthesizing the results, we develop the concept of user involvement and present an analytical framework. Our results have implications for researchers and policy makers, since they throw into question the widely held assumption that involving older people inevitably yields beneficial outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Co-creation and the new landscapes of design
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710880701875068 · Cited by 5,561
User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b15703 · Cited by 3,132
Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think
Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3166.3170 · Cited by 2,066
Participatory Design: Principles and Practices
(2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203744338 · Cited by 1,500
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
Cited by
“But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use
Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971 · Cited by 170
Design Guidelines of Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis
Gomez-Hernandez, M., Ferre, X., Moral, C., & Villalba-Mora, E. (2023) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/43186 · Cited by 161
Technology Used to Recognize Activities of Daily Living in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Camp, N., Lewis, M., Hunter, K., Johnston, J., Zecca, M., Di Nuovo, A., & Magistro, D. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18010163 · Cited by 74
Airola, E. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/23804 · Cited by 63
An Analysis of Usability Evaluation Practices and Contexts of Use in Wearable Robotics
Meyer, J. T., Gassert, R., & Lambercy, O. (2021) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-021-00963-8 · Cited by 58
“A solution to tackle and minimize usability limitations is user-centered design (UCD), which aims to involve the technology stakeholders throughout the device development to more successfully address and meet user needs [11–13].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, B., Peine, A., & Östlund, B.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-11-27
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e513-e523
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2990327199
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/gnz163
- The paper
- Fischer, B., Peine, A., & Östlund, B. (2020). The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design. The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.