The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IDseq—An open source cloud-based pipeline and analysis service for metagenomic pathogen detection and monitoring
Open accessAbstract
Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has enabled the rapid, unbiased detection and identification of microbes without pathogen-specific reagents, culturing, or a priori knowledge of the microbial landscape. mNGS data analysis requires a series of computationally intensive processing steps to accurately determine the microbial composition of a sample. Existing mNGS data analysis tools typically require bioinformatics expertise and access to local server-class hardware resources. For many research laboratories, this presents an obstacle, especially in resource-limited environments. Findings: We present IDseq, an open source cloud-based metagenomics pipeline and service for global pathogen detection and monitoring (https://idseq.net). The IDseq Portal accepts raw mNGS data, performs host and quality filtration steps, then executes an assembly-based alignment pipeline, which results in the assignment of reads and contigs to taxonomic categories. The taxonomic relative abundances are reported and visualized in an easy-to-use web application to facilitate data interpretation and hypothesis generation. Furthermore, IDseq supports environmental background model generation and automatic internal spike-in control recognition, providing statistics that are critical for data interpretation. IDseq was designed with the specific intent of detecting novel pathogens. Here, we benchmark novel virus detection capability using both synthetically evolved viral sequences and real-world samples, including IDseq analysis of a nasopharyngeal swab sample acquired and processed locally in Cambodia from a tourist from Wuhan, China, infected with the recently emergent SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion: The IDseq Portal reduces the barrier to entry for mNGS data analysis and enables bench scientists, clinicians, and bioinformaticians to gain insight from mNGS datasets for both known and novel pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., & Usadel, B. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · Cited by 65,548
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019
Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001017 · Cited by 28,244
O'Leary, N. A., Wright, M. W., Brister, J. R., Ciufo, S., Haddad, D., McVeigh, R., Rajput, B., Robbertse, B., Smith-White, B., Ako-Adjei, D., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1189 · Cited by 6,357
Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments
Wood, D. E., & Salzberg, S. L. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 · Cited by 4,521
MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling
Truong, D. T., Franzosa, E. A., Tickle, T. L., Scholz, M., Weingart, G., Pasolli, E., Tett, A., Huttenhower, C., & Segata, N. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3589 · Cited by 2,185
Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads
Wu, T. D., & Nacu, S. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq057 · Cited by 1,894
Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences
Kim, D., Song, L., Breitwieser, F. P., & Salzberg, S. L. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.210641.116 · Cited by 1,438
Simner, P. J., Miller, S., & Carroll, K. C. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix881 · Cited by 821
Microbial abundance, activity and population genomic profiling with mOTUs2
Milanese, A., Mende, D. R., Paoli, L., Salazar, G., Ruscheweyh, H.-J., Cuenca, M., Hingamp, P., Alves, R., Costea, P. I., Coelho, L. P., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08844-4 · Cited by 446
Comprehensive benchmarking and ensemble approaches for metagenomic classifiers
McIntyre, A. B. R., Ounit, R., Afshinnekoo, E., Prill, R. J., Hénaff, E., Alexander, N., Minot, S. S., Danko, D., Foox, J., Ahsanuddin, S., et al. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1299-7 · Cited by 342
Cited by
Madera, S., Kistler, A., Ranaivoson, H. C., Ahyong, V., Andrianiaina, A., Andry, S., Raharinosy, V., Randriambolamanantsoa, T. H., Ravelomanantsoa, N. A. F., Tato, C. M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00921-22 · Cited by 74
Self-citationPeng, J., Liu, J., Mann, S. A., Mitchell, A. M., Laurie, M. T., Sunshine, S., Pilarowski, G., Ayscue, P., Kistler, A., Vanaerschot, M., et al. (2022) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciab283 · Cited by 41
Self-citationYasir, M., Alkhaldy, A. A., Soliman, S. A., Turkistani, S. A., & Azhar, E. I. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12183342 · Cited by 16
Pathogen and Antibody Identification in Children with Encephalitis in Myanmar
Galardi, M. M., Sowa, G. M., Crockett, C. D., Rudock, R., Smith, A. E., Shwe, E. E., San, T., Linn, K., Aye, A. M. M., Ramachandran, P. S., et al. (2023) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.26560 · Cited by 14
Acharya, P., Lloyd, C., Lam, N. T., Kumke, J., Ray, S., Yanira Muñoz Ramirez, Z., Das, S., & Lam, H. N. (2026) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00870-25 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalantar, K. L., Carvalho, T., de Bourcy, C. F. A., Dimitrov, B., Dingle, G., Egger, R., Han, J., Holmes, O. B., Juan, Y.-F., King, R., Kislyuk, A., Lin, M. F., Mariano, M., Morse, T., Reynoso, L. V., Cruz, D. R., Sheu, J., Tang, J., Wang, J., Zhang, M. A., Zhong, E., Ahyong, V., Lay, S., Chea, S., Bohl, J. A., Manning, J. E., Tato, C. M., & DeRisi, J. L.
- Venue
- GigaScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 2047-217X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093218166
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 13.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.